Rachel Dalton looks at Clegg and Webb’s plan to allow parents to access pensions to help children get on the property ladder.
Conference season always throws up ideas from political parties that are towards the more fanciful end of the scale, but Nick Clegg’s plan to allow parents or grandparents to guarantee their children’s mortgages with pension entitlements has been labelled outright as “bonkers” by the industry.
Experts have already thrown up several problems with the proposed scheme, and many are hoping it will fall by the wayside before the Autumn Statement.
The Deputy Prime Minister announced on 23 September that the Liberal Democrats have proposed a system where parents or grandparents could use their pension commencement lump sum to guarantee their children’s mortgages.
This is in response to the problem of younger people being unable to afford ever-increasing deposits on properties, with the average age of first time buyers having grown from 28 to 35 over last decade, according to research by the Post Office.
Since Clegg’s announcement, further details have emerged. The Lib Dems believe around 250,000 people have a pension pot of around £40,000, with a PCLS of 25%. The party said around 5% of those with a suitable PCLS will take up the scheme, meaning 12,500 could use it to benefit their children.
If their children then default on mortgage payments, the PCLS would be at risk, but the remainder of the pension entitlement would not. It is not yet clear whether individuals would be able to use their PCLS to back any mortgage, or if it would be restricted to family members’ mortgages.
Progress so far
Some commentators dismissed the proposals out-of-hand as conference season bluster. However, there is evidence that the proposals are actually a step further towards the statute books than previously thought.
A Lib Dem spokesperson confirmed that Clegg has passed on the plans to pensions minister Steve Webb, who will now consult with the industry on which products it could design to make the scheme feasible.
Webb has already responded in the media to criticism of the plans, saying they will not reduce retirement income as they would only utilise PCLS money, which is usually withdrawn at the earliest opportunity to fund holidays or pay for home improvements anyway.
Given the negative reaction to the plans from the industry, it would appear that some bodies have been taken by surprise by the proposals.
Association of British Insurers director general Otto Thoresen said: “We would want to look closely at the detail of the scheme.
The government has published proposals to keep the British Steel Pension Scheme out of the PPF while reducing its liabilities to make Tata Steel UK more attractive to buyers. Stephanie Baxter explores the options.
More than a quarter of savers (28%) have never reviewed their retirement savings, according to figures from Aviva.
Eversheds has been appointed to provide legal advice to the trustee of the P&O Pension Scheme, with effect from May 2016.
The BHS case has raised questions about the powers of trustees to hold sponsors to account. Michael Klimes looks at whether they should have more control