Multi-manager: in the line of fire

clock

While considered a good way for smaller funds to diversify, the reputation of multi-manager strategies has been tarnished, as Andrew Sheen reports

For smaller pension funds looking to make investments in a broad range of asset classes without the attendant difficulties of overseeing many different individual managers, multi-manager strategies...

To continue reading this article...

Join Professional Pensions

  • Unlimited access to real-time news, analysis and opinion from the industry
  • Receive our in-depth monthly magazine in either print or digital format
  • Access our Sustainable Investment Hub covering news and opinion from thought leaders in the ESG space
  • Receive important and breaking news stories selected by the Editors in our daily newsletter
  • Hear from industry experts and other forward-thinking leaders
  • Receive a monthly members-only newsletter with exclusive opinion pieces from leading industry experts and a feature from the magazine in advance of its release date

Join now

 

Already a Professional Pensions
member?

Login

More on Multi-manager

Industry Voice: Multi asset - winning is mainly about not losing

Industry Voice: Multi asset - winning is mainly about not losing

On the road, foul weather creates hazards and panics drivers. In markets, drawdowns have a similar impact.

Multi-managers adapting under pressure

Traditional multi-management firms have increased their offerings following calls for more fiduciary responsibility, as Helen Fowler reports

Helen Fowler
clock 03 November 2010 •

A need for transparency

Multi-manager strategies have allowed smaller pension funds to diversify their investments through a broad range of asset classes, but have often been criticised for their lack of transparency. Andrew Sheen weighs up the pros and cons of this approach...

Andrew Sheen
clock 28 May 2009 •
Trustpilot