NETHERLANDS - The proposal to set up a pension protection fund in the Netherlands was deemed "useless" by asset liability management professor Guus Boender.
Boender, CEO of Ortec, an independent asset liability management company, explained why it was highly unlikely a Dutch pension protection fund would be set up.
"A fund based on the pension schemes' funding ratio makes no sense," he said. "The correlation between the ratios is too close."
"If a pension plan's funding decreases because of a drop in the equity market, then all other pension schemes will also be affected by this phenomenon," explained Boender, adding the protection fund itself would take a hit.
In his dismissal of guarantee funds, Boender suggested having a fund to protect against the bankruptcy of the sponsoring employer.
Pension plans themselves taking out insurance as a safeguard against the employer going bankrupt would make sense, he concluded.
The PPF 7800 deficit was slashed in half last month as gilt yields rose. Victoria Ticha asks if this is the start of a longer trend
Frank Field is to warn Sir Philip Green not to sell his Arcadia business without ensuring defined benefit (DB) pensions are adequately protected, PP can confirm.
Some 79% of people would like to see stricter rules and checks to ensure pension pots are secure, according to a survey by the Pensions and Lifetime Savings Association (PLSA).
An analysis of IGC annual reports finds some lacking in information on value for money, costs and charges, and investment performance. James Phillips explores the findings