CANADA - Unions representing public servants, military and Royal Canadian Mounted Police (RCMP) personnel have lost a claim for the C$46bn (US$46.5bn) surplus generated in their pension plans.
Justice de Lotbiniere Panet ruled against members of the Public Service, Canadian Forces and the RCMP superannuation plans yesterday, in a case which has been battled in the courts since 1999.
The case related to two claims, the first on the government’s amortisation of a surplus of around $18bn between 1990-91 and 1999-2000. The 18 unions, employee associations and pensioner groups involved in the case claimed they had an equitable interest in the surplus and, because the government was not the owner of the surplus which had accumulated prior to 2000, its action was improper and illegal.
The second claim related to legislation amending the terms of the pension plans, which allowed the government to withdraw around $28bn in surplus from the superannuation accounts.
The Professional Institute of the Public Service of Canada (PIPSC), one of the unions involved in the action, argued that one of the main contributors to the surplus was the fact workers were paying into the fund based on calculations that assumed workers were receiving annual wage increases, when they had been subject to a six-year salary freeze in the 1990s.
However, Justice de Lotbiniere Panet found in favour of the government which argued that the superannuation account did not hold assets capable of being subject of legal or equitable interest.
Michele Demers, president of PIPSC, said they were now reviewing the decision and would discuss possible courses of action, including appealing the case.
She said: “The federal government is the only jurisdiction where unilaterally taking the surplus is legally possible but so morally and ethically wrong.”
Most respondents in this week's Pensions Buzz do not think businesses should be able suspend AE contributions if in financial distress.
Former BHS owner Dominic Chappell has lost the appeal against his section 72 conviction and sentence for failing to hand over information to The Pensions Regulator (TPR).
This week's top stories include Marsh and McLennan Companies agreeing to buy JLT, and the home secretary calling for AE to be scrapped in a no-deal Brexit scenario.
Lesley Titcomb says the watchdog wants closer interactions with pension funds to spot problems sooner and act before having to use its more stringent powers