UK - Goldman Sachs in the US has vigorously defended the use of pre-hedging in transition management, providing a strong indication that any attempt to ban the practice globally would be met with heavy opposition on its part.
Pre-hedging – trading on the knowledge of a clients’ impending re-allocation of assets – is set to be prohibited under the UK transition management industry’s impending T-Charter.
Global Pensions exclusively revealed in July that Goldman’s had withdrawn its support for the T-Charter after failing to reconcile differences with members of the sub-committee responsible for drafting the code.
Industry sources confirmed pre-hedging was the key point of contention.
Speaking at a Global Pensions’ round table in New York, Jason Gans, vice president, transition management at Goldman’s, said: “Pre-hedging, unfortunately, has gotten a negative connotation in the transition world. This process has been going on in programme trading for many years and clients all over the world have been satisfied with the outcomes.
“It’s our philosophy that disclosure and transparency is very important, and there are certain times when clients come to us and ask us for a disclosed risk bid. All those risks involved with pre-hedging are communicated to the client. So whether it’s committing principal to transitions or committing principal to our programme clients, it’s done when clients are aware of it, and that’s the bottom line.”
Peter Herbert, managing director of transition management at Goldman’s, added that the firm’s pre-hedging language was in its documentation.
Most respondents in this week's Pensions Buzz do not think businesses should be able suspend AE contributions if in financial distress.
Former BHS owner Dominic Chappell has lost the appeal against his section 72 conviction and sentence for failing to hand over information to The Pensions Regulator (TPR).
This week's top stories include Marsh and McLennan Companies agreeing to buy JLT, and the home secretary calling for AE to be scrapped in a no-deal Brexit scenario.
Lesley Titcomb says the watchdog wants closer interactions with pension funds to spot problems sooner and act before having to use its more stringent powers