
Canadian union slams OMERS Bill 2006

CANADA - A government plan to revise the management of the C$36bn Ontario Municipal Employees Retirement System (OMERS) has been criticised for making the plan unaccountable to members.
The Canadian Union of Public Employees (CUPE) Ontario has demanded that Dalton McGuinty's Liberal government make drastic amendments to the OMERS Bill 206.
Brian O'Keefe, secretary-treasurer of CUPE said: “There will be 40 directors on two boards, with neither board, nor an individual director, held accountable to anyone. CUPE cannot allow this to happen.”
OMERS is currently sponsored by the government of Ontario which, while it makes no direct contributions to the plan, appoints employer and employee members to the board to oversee administration and investments.
Bill 206 would transfer the government’s role to the “Sponsors Corporation” of employer and employee representatives, along similar lines to the structure of other major public sector plans such as the Ontario Teachers’ Pension Plan.
But CUPE have said the decision-making capacity of OMERS has been limited by the recent inclusion of a two-thirds voting majority requirement for the Sponsors' Corporation board, which it said made it “virtually impossible” to take decisions about members' benefits and contributions.
OMERS has said that as plan administrator it cannot enter into public disputes on these matters.“While Bill 206 is an important piece of legislation that will have an impact on the OMERS governance model, OMERS day-to-day focus will not change and OMERS pensions remain secure,” it said.
Latest stories
Croydon sets up asset-backed funding to reduce pension contributions
An innovative funding structure has been agreed for Croydon Pension Fund. However, there are some concerns about the arrangement. Stephanie Baxter reports
Half of pension scam red flags raised by schemes involves advisers, finds survey
Some 52% of red flags raised by schemes on suspected scam pension transfers involve advisers or unregulated introducers, a report by the Pension Scams Industry Group (PSIG) has claimed.
Norfolk Pension Fund wins rare US securities fraud class action case
The Norfolk Pension Fund has been successful as the lead plaintiff in a class action case that went to jury trial in California involving securities fraud.
Have your say: Should CEOs have to pay into the same staff DB scheme as their workers?
In this week's Pensions Buzz, we want to know whether bosses should have to pay into the same staff DB scheme as their workers rather than their own executive pension fund.