Stakeholder has caused a shake-up in the AVC market, new research by Bacon & Woodrow shows.
Its survey revealed that AVC providers are bowing to pressure imposed by stakeholder’s 1% cap and are moving to equalise charges.
The survey also revealed that charges and resulting reduction in yield figures had fallen dramatically in the last year as providers began to position their AVC contracts alongside their new stakeholder products.
Bacon & Woodrow said the fall was greatest for lower rates of contributions – the average impact of charges on a £50 per month managed fund AVC contract over a five year period had dropped from 1.5% to 0.8% a year.
Bacon & Woodrow partner Kevin Wesbroom said: “Profit margins for insurers and others participating in the AVC market will be substantially lower in the future and only the strongest players will survive. Pension scheme trustees will need to remain vigilant in ensuring that their contract terms reflect the most competitive available.
The survey also revealed a growing sophistication in the AVC market as some of the principles and practices associated with stakeholder rub-off.
Half the providers in the market are now offering contracts with a range of investment managers, representing a shift away from the traditional “bundled” product and bringing increased choice and diversification opportunities for scheme trustees.
Bacon & Woodrow said this trend would continue as other providers developed their systems to accommodate new-style contracts and “guest” fund managers.
Senior consultant and AVC specialist Chris Cairns said: The dawn of the stakeholder environment, the discrediting of league tables as an approach to investment, and the multiplicity of investment options available means that trustees need to take a radically different look at AVCs.”
By Michael Schiniou
The Pensions and Lifetime Savings Association (PLSA) has announced it will shrink its board by more than one-third as part of a governance overhaul to make it "agile and more appropriate".
Smaller FTSE 350 defined benefit (DB) schemes were nearly 15 percentage points less well-funded than larger schemes in 2017, according to a Goldman Sachs Asset Management (GSAM) analysis.
The advent of collective pension systems could help the UK avoid demographic challenges which will make it "impossible" for society to help savers in retirement, experts say.