EUROPE - The European Federation for Retirement Provision (EFRP) has given ‘qualified support' to the proposal for a portability directive put forward today by the European Commission today, but warned of increased costs.
The proposal modifies member states’ social and labour law to make occupational pensions flexible.
Chairman Jaap Maassen said that “increasing the coverage of affordable and adequate occupational pension provision calls for simplification and cost-effectiveness”.
He added: “Increased costs ultimately mean lower pensions unless contributions increase significantly and increased contributions would risk endangering the competitiveness of the European economy.”
The EFRP said it still had “many reservations” when it comes to putting the concept into practice because of the “large diversity” in occupational pension schemes and types of funding vehicles across the EU.
According to the federation, a number of principles underpinning the directive will not only bring about changes in member states’ social and labour law but will also increase the costs of occupational pensions.
The EFRP cited concern over:
-Shortening qualifying and vesting periods-Granting the right to transfer, which it said may not always be the best option available-Imposing more information requirements on plan sponsors or pension providers
The cost impact could be dramatic considering that 1 percentage point indexation of both deferred pension entitlements and pensions in payment corresponds to a 15% increase in liabilities, the EFRP added.
Maassen added: “To avoid policy failures in times of ageing societies the functioning and long term effects of the different types of occupational pensions funding need better understanding by policy makers and the working population.
“Collective capitalisation offers the most cost-efficient way to fund occupational pensions. A difficult balance needs to be achieved between providing affordable and adequate occupational pensions and increasing the flexibility of labour markets.”
An innovative funding structure has been agreed for Croydon Pension Fund. However, there are some concerns about the arrangement. Stephanie Baxter reports
Some 52% of red flags raised by schemes on suspected scam pension transfers involve advisers or unregulated introducers, a report by the Pension Scams Industry Group (PSIG) has claimed.
In this week's Pensions Buzz, we want to know whether bosses should have to pay into the same staff DB scheme as their workers rather than their own executive pension fund.
The Norfolk Pension Fund has been successful as the lead plaintiff in a class action case that went to jury trial in California involving securities fraud.