SWITZERLAND - The performance of Swiss public pension funds is not high partly due to restrictive investment regulations and the generally conservative investment practises of Swiss firms, according to new research.
‘Policy approaches to promote private and occupational old-age provision in Switzerland’ is a paper by Alfonso Souza-Poza and Jacob van Dam prepared for the Bertelsmann Foundation as part of a multi-country project examining old-age provision in different nations.
According to the paper, restrictive investment regulations also mean that part-time employed individuals - most notably women - and low-income earners do not receive benefits from the second pillar.
In addition, there is no competition in the current occupational pension scheme system. Souza-Poza and van Dam say certain proponents argue that benefits could improve if workers were allowed more freedom in their choice of insurer.
The authors add that the Swiss system is very complex and one potential disadvantage of this complexity is that an average person has difficulties in fully understanding it.
By Luke Clancy
The proposed cold-calling ban may be ineffective if a collaborative regulatory approach between the UK and the European Union (EU) is not maintained post-Brexit, the Pensions Management Institute (PMI) has warned.
Some 56% of defined contribution (DC) asset managers do not believe they will have transaction cost information in time for pension funds' March year-end statements, according to Lane Clark & Peacock (LCP) research.
NEST has appointed Clive Elphick, Martin Turner, Mutaz Qubbaj and Chris Hitchen as trustee members of its reshaped board.
Most people want to avoid investing in projects that contribute to climate change, and would consider moving to another less-exposed provider, according to a survey commissioned by ClientEarth.