• Home
  • Admin/Tech
  • Benefits
  • Buzz
  • DB
  • DC
  • Diversity
  • Investment
  • Law & regulation
  • Risk reduction
  • Events
  • Whitepapers
  • ESG spotlight
  • PPTV
  • Newsletters
  • Sign in
  • Events
    • Upcoming events
      event logo
      Risk Reduction Forum 2019

      The Risk Reduction Forum seeks to arm trustees and scheme professionals with practical insights around best practice, and takeaways they can apply to their own scheme

      • Date: 14 Mar 2019
      • Radisson Blu Bloomsbury, London
      event logo
      Rising Star Awards 2019

      Professional Pensions has launched its inaugural Rising Stars Awards to celebrate the emerging talent in pensions

      • Date: 27 Mar 2019
      • Proud Embankment, London
      event logo
      Defined Contribution Conference 2019

      This exclusive one day conference will provide a comprehensive overview of the evolving DC landscape, and examine how Trustees and Pension Scheme Managers can overcome the challenges they face

      • Date: 24 Apr 2019
      • The Bloomsbury Hotel, 16-22 Great Russell St, London WC1B 3NN, London
      event logo
      UK Pensions Awards 2019

      Make a date in your diary. These awards are the single largest gathering and a veritable 'who's who' of the corporate pensions industry in the UK.

      • Date: 23 May 2019
      • Hilton Park Lane 22 Park Lane, Mayfair, London W1K 1BE, London
      View all events
      Follow our Professional Pension Events

      Sign up to receive email alerts about our events

      Sign up
  • Whitepapers
    • How DC schemes can gain exposure to different asset classes in a low-return environment

      So far, DC plans have largely been focused on the onset of auto-enrolment and changes to the regulatory framework - be it the ‘charge cap,' ‘pension freedoms' or consultations around ‘value for money', says Annabel Tonry, Executive Director at J.P. Morgan Asset Management (JPMAM).

      Download
      Pension freedoms three years on

      In 2015 George Osborne, then the UK Chancellor of the Exchequer, decided that those age over 55 could take much more of their pension in cash. This has since opened up a range of possibilities for DC scheme members in the world of pensions.

      Download
      Find whitepapers
      Search by title or subject area
      View all whitepapers
  • ESG spotlight
  • Sign in
    •  

      You are currently accessing ProfessionalPensions via your Enterprise account.

      If you already have an account please use the link below to sign in.

      If you have any problems with your access or would like to request an individual access account please contact our customer service team.

      Phone: +44 (0) 1858 438800

      Email: [email protected]

      • Sign in
     
      • Newsletters
      • Account details
      • Contact support
      • Sign out
     
  • Follow us
    • RSS
    • Twitter
    • LinkedIn
    • Newsletters
    • YouTube
  • Register
  • Subscribe
Professional Pensions
Professional Pensions
  • Home
  • Admin/Tech
  • Benefits
  • Buzz
  • DB
  • DC
  • Diversity
  • Investment
  • Law & regulation
  • Risk reduction
  •  

    You are currently accessing ProfessionalPensions via your Enterprise account.

    If you already have an account please use the link below to sign in.

    If you have any problems with your access or would like to request an individual access account please contact our customer service team.

    Phone: +44 (0) 1858 438800

    Email: [email protected]

    • Sign in
 
    • Newsletters
    • Account details
    • Contact support
    • Sign out
 
Professional Pensions
  • United Kingdom

Watson Wyatt warns over impact of negative inflation on schemes

numbers-small-jpg
  • Jonathan Stapleton
  • 25 March 2009
  • Tweet  
  • Facebook  
  • LinkedIn  
  • Google plus  
  • Send to  
0 Comments

UK - Significant rises in price levels are needed to stop negative inflation being used to calculate pension increases, Watson Wyatt calculates.

The consultant said - while retail price inflation over 12 months fell to zero in February, rather than turning negative as most commentators had predicted - a further 3.3% increase in the price level between the end of February and September would be needed to prevent negative inflation being recorded at the date most commonly used to calculate pension increases.

It warned in some cases a period of negative 12-month retail price index inflation could permanently increase the real value of some defined benefit pensions.

But it said that it could be possible that one year's deflation could be used to offset pension increases in the following year if a modest level of inflation returns.

With the impact of interest rate cuts and quantitative easing yet to be felt in full, and the VAT cut due to be reversed in January 2010, pension schemes may have to contend first with a period of deflation and then with a period of prices rising quickly.

Watson Wyatt head of defined benefit pension consulting John Ball said: "Tax rules make it unlikely that pensions would actually be cut but there is still a question about whether one year's deflation can be used cancel to out the next year's pension increases.

"If the scheme rules say this should happen, cost-conscious employers might not volunteer to pay for increases that do not have to be given. Trustees may also ask whether awarding pension increases above those required by the rules is fair on younger members, particularly if the scheme has a big deficit."

He added: "When the rules were written, no one really expected inflation to go negative. Accordingly, trustees may find themselves with a legal mess to untangle at a time when negotiating with the employer over how quickly the deficit can be paid off ought to be their top priority."

Ball added that - with impact of interest rate cuts and quantitative easing yet to be felt in full, and the VAT cut due to be reversed in January 2010 - pension schemes may have to contend first with a period of deflation and then with a period of prices rising quickly.

He said: "A few months ago, pension schemes were wondering whether inflation would go through the 5% barrier and lead to pension increases being capped. Next, they had to consider the possibility that inflation would go negative and it is too early to rule that out. If this happens, it will increase the real value of some people's pensions at the expense of their former employers.

"Trustees and scheme sponsors could now find themselves in the odd position of planning both for deflation and for faster inflation. The fact that the authorities started printing money after a month when prices rose shows how much uncertainty there is about the medium-term outlook. These risks are difficult to hedge: if a scheme buys index-linked gilts to protect itself against rising inflation, it will lose money in a deflationary environment.

Schemes which bought in annuity contracts exactly matching their obligations to pensioners may be particularly appreciative of the two-way inflation protection this provides."

BACKGROUND

Once in payment, defined benefit pensions accrued after April 5, 1997 are increased either in line with a statutory default basis or in accordance with the scheme's own rules.

For schemes using the statutory default basis, it is inflation in the year to September that determines the scale of pension increases.

If inflation were negative in September 2009 - as HM Treasury and most independent forecasters predict it will be - statutory default basis pensions would stay flat in cash terms and therefore rise relative to prices.

If inflation were positive again in September 2010, Watson Wyatt said it expected statutory default basis pensions would be increased with no offset for the previous year's deflation, though increases are capped if inflation rises above 5% (or 2.5% in the case of some benefits accrued from 2005). Similar arrangements apply to guaranteed minimum pensions accrued between 1988 and 1997, but with a 3 per cent cap.

For other, non-statutory default basis, schemes, the month used to increase benefits accrued after 1997 will depend on the scheme rules.

These rules may also signal whether trustees are permitted, or even required, to reduce pensions if inflation turns negative. The answer to this question could be different between post-1997 benefits and pre-1997 benefits that are not GMPs.

Even where scheme rules say that some of the pensions can be reduced, this could lead to penal tax charges which make reductions look unlikely in practice. Alternatively, some scheme rules may either permit or require trustees to use one year's deflation to offset any inflationary increase due the following year. If this rule applies only to the pre-1997 benefits, some pensioners will have part of their benefit increased in line with the statutory default and part of their benefit increased by a lower amount in line with scheme rules.


Related articles

  • Half of pension scam red flags raised by schemes involves advisers, finds survey
  • Norfolk Pension Fund wins rare US securities fraud class action case
  • Have your say: Should CEOs have to pay into the same staff DB scheme as their workers?
  • People Moves Blog: Mercer creates DB consolidation advisory team; Salvus appoints Parr as trustee
  • Savers are ultimately responsible for their own decisions, says industry
  • Tweet  
  • Facebook  
  • LinkedIn  
  • Google plus  
  • Send to  
  • Topics
  • United Kingdom
  • Fixed Income
  • Risk Management

Latest stories

Croydon Town Hall
Croydon sets up asset-backed funding to reduce pension contributions

An innovative funding structure has been agreed for Croydon Pension Fund. However, there are some concerns about the arrangement. Stephanie Baxter reports

  • Defined Benefit
  • 19 February 2019
Half of pension scam red flags raised by schemes involves advisers, finds survey

Some 52% of red flags raised by schemes on suspected scam pension transfers involve advisers or unregulated introducers, a report by the Pension Scams Industry Group (PSIG) has claimed.

  • Law and Regulation
  • 19 February 2019
judge hammer
Norfolk Pension Fund wins rare US securities fraud class action case

The Norfolk Pension Fund has been successful as the lead plaintiff in a class action case that went to jury trial in California involving securities fraud.

  • Law and Regulation
  • 19 February 2019
question
Have your say: Should CEOs have to pay into the same staff DB scheme as their workers?

In this week's Pensions Buzz, we want to know whether bosses should have to pay into the same staff DB scheme as their workers rather than their own executive pension fund.

  • Industry
  • 19 February 2019
Back to Top

Most read

judge hammer
Norfolk Pension Fund wins rare US securities fraud class action case
Croydon Town Hall
Croydon sets up asset-backed funding to reduce pension contributions
calculator
GMP equalisation could land DB members with six figure tax bill
Half of pension scam red flags raised by schemes involves advisers, finds survey
Rising Star Awards
Rising Star Awards 2019 - Shortlists published
  • Contact Us
  • Marketing solutions
  • About Incisive Media
  • Terms and conditions
  • Privacy and Cookie policy
  • RSS
  • Twitter
  • LinkedIn
  • Newsletters
  • YouTube

© Incisive Business Media (IP) Limited, Published by Incisive Business Media Limited, New London House, 172 Drury Lane, London WC2B 5QR, registered in England and Wales with company registration numbers 09177174 & 09178013

Digital publisher of the year
Digital publisher of the year 2010, 2013, 2016 & 2017