GLOBAL - The majority of pension funds view sovereign wealth funds (SWFs) as innovative and ground-breaking investors rather than as competition, show the results of the latest Global Pensions 100 Panel.
However, several of the 50% majority made the point that while they agreed SWFs would lead in investment innovation, they were not convinced they would make the best examples for pension funds to follow.
"I agree with the statement itself," stated one panel member. "[As for the question of whether] this is something for other pension funds to follow, I'm not too sure."
"Sovereign wealth funds are simply another pool of institutional capital that should be considered in analysing capital flows and investment opportunities," commented another respondent.
"They have similarities to endowments, but also additional constraints and should not be considered as an example for pension funds. Pension funds should invest their risk capital into diversified portfolios that will provide the highest probability of meeting their required actuarial returns based on available investment opportunities."
Another panel member made the point that even though SWFs have been in the headlines for a while, they are still a relatively new phenomenon in the world of international investment, saying: "[It's] too early to tell, [they] may be competition for access to good investments."
Only 21% of respondents chose to respond that SWFs have "no impact" on pension fund investment.
Despite improvements in investment manager attitudes towards responsible investment, research reveals there is a way to go before the majority deliver meaningful action. Victoria Ticha explores why
The Co-operative Bank is set to continue de-risking pension schemes after it mitigated further losses by switching from the retail prices index (RPI) to the consumer prices index (CPI).
A model aimed at reducing climate change-related financial risk exposure from corporate credit assets has been launched by Insight Investment.
Universities Superannuation Scheme (USS) members should be responsible for most of the cost of increased contributions if the scheme's defined benefit (DB) section remains open to accrual, Pensions Buzz respondents say.