EUROPE - Benefit cuts could be the only way for pension funds to survive Solvency II legislation, according to Allianz Global Investors (AllianzGI).
Gerhard Scheuenstuhl, managing director of risklab germany GmbH, which carried out the survey with AllianzGI, said risk sharing would ease some of the funding burden on companies but more work was needed in this area before implementing such strategies.
Scheuenstuhl commented: "As an extreme version, the employees' agreement to benefit cuts is the most effective arrangement in terms of Solvency II as it currently stands but most likely it is not the one favoured by employees and pensioners."
A pension scheme would have to raise funding levels to 169% on an IAS 19 basis, which could mean reducing equity and alternative exposure in its portfolio, according to the analysis.
Allianz said pension funds were set up differently to insurance companies which the legislation was designed to cover, so guidelines in their current form would have to be adapted if it was to comprise both industries.
Brigitte Miksa, head of pensions international, AllianzGI said: "Solvency II aims to ensure adequate policyholder protection in all EU member states through the requirement for a level of funding that more closely matches the true risks of insurance undertakings."
Miksa continued: "Our research shows that to apply Solvency II in its current form could be the final nail in the coffin for DB schemes."
The Brunel Pension Partnership has become the fourth local authority pool to receive the green light from the regulator.
Defined benefit (DB) schemes are to be offered a new consolidator as the former chief of the Pension Protection Fund (PPF) launches 'The Pension SuperFund'.
Martin Freeman has been hired as head of technology product and development at Smart Pension, to support the 'growing' technology product side of the business.
Tim Sharp says the government has missed some big opportunities to help workers in the DB white paper.