UK - Liberal Democrat plans to assign ratings for final salary schemes have been dismissed as empty "headline-grabbing" ideas by Alexander Forbes Financial Services.
The party wants to reform occupational schemes by launching a kite mark-style programme which would enable employees to check how their company’s fund was rated.
However, AFFS marketing director David Marlow dismissed the proposals and said: “The real problem facing many final salary schemes is that they are so underfunded that companies can no longer afford to keep their pension promises.
“The LibDem proposals donít have any details about how to make schemes more affordable for employers and the only real solution for many businesses is to close their final salary schemes and offer employees high quality DC alternatives.”
Marlow added that while members of well-funded schemes would welcome the mark, employers with underfunded schemes would struggle to recruit and retain staff. He also claimed the costs of complying with the proposals could prompt further scheme closures.
He said: “The kite mark idea is great for firms with well-funded schemes but those which fail to reach the standard may find it harder to recruit and retain staff.”
A buyout tool which provides schemes with up-to-date pricing and comparisons between insurers has been launched by JLT Employee Benefits.
The DB white paper sets out plans to review the funding regime, with 'prudent' and 'appropriate' possibly redefined. But James Phillips asks if this could this signal a return to an MFR-like approach?
The trustees of GKN's pension schemes have agreed a package of mitigation measures that would improve funding to a "more prudent level" if Melrose's offer is accepted by shareholders next week.
While the new powers are welcome, most respondents doubt it will make a difference to the outcomes for members, Pensions Buzz respondents say.