UK - Unilever barrister Jonathan Sumption QC yesterday attempted in the High Court to prove that one of the key points of Merrill Lynch Investment Managers' (MLIM) defence was flawed.
He said that part of MLIM’s case rests on proving that monitoring total fund active risk – the likelihood of investment underperformance based on historical models – rather than UK equity active ri...
To continue reading this article...
Join Professional Pensions
- Unlimited access to real-time news, analysis and opinion from the industry
- Receive our in-depth monthly magazine in either print or digital format
- Access our Sustainable Investment Hub covering news and opinion from thought leaders in the ESG space
- Receive important and breaking news stories selected by the Editors in our daily newsletter
- Hear from industry experts and other forward-thinking leaders
- Receive a monthly members-only newsletter with exclusive opinion pieces from leading industry experts and a feature from the magazine in advance of its release date