UK - Many employers are considering restructuring their death-in-service benefits in reaction to the single events limits imposed on these group contracts by insurers since the September 11 terrorist attacks, says Watson Wyatt.
Watson Wyatt head of healthcare and risk consulting, David Cross (pictured), predicts one result will be an increasing emphasis on lump sum payments and a potential reduction in death-in-service pension provision.
“Since 9/11, insurers have typically placed single event limits of between £50m and £100m,” Cross said.
“Whilst these are significant sums, for companies with large concentrations of employees there is a risk of a potential shortfall in the event of a catastrophe.”
In light of the limitations, Watson Wyatt is encouraging employers to review their group death-in-service arrangements. Options suggested include spreading death-in-service cover across two or more insurers, changing the contractual arrangements with employees to guarantee benefits only up to the limits of insurability and rethinking the way death-in-service benefits are designed.
“With the onset of pensions simplification, many employers are taking the opportunity to rethink the way death-in-service benefits are structured,” Cross said.
“Death-in-service pensions are increasingly expensive compared with lump sums as well as being generally less tax efficient under the simplification proposals. Giving employees the option to convert death-in-service entitlements to lump sum benefits through flexible benefit schemes could be one mechanism used to reduce or control overall exposures.”
A suite of liability driven investment (LDI) indices has been launched by STOXX and RiskFirst to aid trustees and consultants select, monitor and challenge managers.
British Airways and the trustees of one of its pension schemes are set to argue over the purpose of a pension scheme, leading to an impactful judgment for DB pensions. James Phillips explores the issue
Bank of England governor Mark Carney has said there is still a lot of data to consider before the Monetary Policy Committee (MPC) can decide when to next hike interest rates.
Savers are not squandering their tax-free lump sums under Freedom and Choice but are taking a more cautious approach to retirement, according to Prudential research.