UK - Property investment funds are unlikely to lure schemes away from traditional vehicles, Mercer Investment Consulting claims.
Mercer – responding to the government’s consultation document on how PIFs should be introduced – believes it will be too costly for schemes to convert their property investments into PIFs.
Mercer senior investment consultant Greg Wright said: “We can see PIFs appealing to the retail investor for whom the choice of liquid, cost-effective balanced commercial property investment vehicles has been limited.
“But many schemes gain their commercial property exposure through other types of pooled vehicles, and it is far from certain that it will be cost-effective to convert PUTs to PIFs. As a result, while funds putting new money into property will probably want to look at PIFs, it is possible that the bulk of existing investments may stay in PUTs.”
Investment Management Association regulation and taxation director Julie Patterson welcomed the introduction of PIFs – known as Real Estate Investment Trusts in other countries – but added that the government must go further to make them attractive to investors.
She said: “One simple change to the Collective Investment Scheme tax regime, which would remove tax leakage at vehicle level, would be the catalyst for change in the property investment market that the government so desires.”
Females can expect to live a greater number of years in poor health than males, according to data from the Office for National Statistics (ONS) for 2015 to 2017.
Scottish higher-rate taxpayers will benefit from more pensions tax relief than workers on the same salary anywhere else in the UK as income tax bands continue to diverge.
Schemes risk breaking the law and being forced to wind up as The Pensions Regulator (TPR) warns some may be master trusts but do not know so.
As a hectic 2018 draws to an end, Jonathan Stapleton wishes readers a quieter 2019.