UK - Pension funds would be over £40bn richer if allocations to property were at their 1980s peak, new research shows.
Research carried out by London Business School and Aberdeen Property Investors shows that if pension funds had a 20% allocation to property, instead of the current 4% average in the past three years, they would be approximately £44bn better off.
Pension funds’ property allocation was as high as 20% during the 1980s, but rapidly fell after market crashes. Trustees have been reluctant to increase allocations despite several years of consistent outperformance relative to equities and bonds.
API chief executive David Hunter argues it is time for schemes to rethink their attitude to property.
He said: “Managers didn’t think that the property market would remain so strong.
“Unfortunately, pension funds decided to switch from the property market at almost exactly the same time that the market fell. It is likely, though, that next year will start to see the switch.”
This week's top stories include Marsh and McLennan Companies agreeing to buy JLT, and the home secretary calling for AE to be scrapped in a no-deal Brexit scenario.
Lesley Titcomb says the watchdog wants closer interactions with pension funds to spot problems sooner and act before having to use its more stringent powers
The Pension Protection Fund (PPF) is consulting on proposals to charge a "risk reflective" levy for commercial defined benefit (DB) consolidation vehicles.
The funding gap across FTSE 350 schemes could be slashed by as much as £275bn if schemes look beyond traditional ways of creating value. Victoria Ticha examines how