GLOBAL - People and process are without doubt more important to pension funds than past performance, confirmed the results of October's Global Pensions 100 Panel.
Every single one of the pension fund respondents to the survey chose people and process as more important than past performance when giving a mandate to a new asset manager.
The results support the findings of UK research released in September by Fidelity, which found that local authority pension funds considered performance less important than people when it came to choosing managers.
Consultants have also agreed with the findings.
Scott Vincent, head of global fixed income research at Russell, said: “Past performance is useful to gauge what a manager should produce, but short term historical evidence is of very little use when looking into long term returns.”
Meanwhile, Craig Baker, global head of manager research at Watson Wyatt, said that unfortunately in the past there had been a tendency to choose managers based on past growth and not prospective returns, but hopefully this would change over time.
Baker stressed: “While it may well be a tired cliché, we strongly believe that past performance alone is a very poor guide to future performance. This is why we focus on the ‘people’ aspect when doing manager research and it is good to see this survey supports this.”
BNY Mellon has launched a range of reporting tools to help institutional investor clients track and evaluate portfolio investments based on environmental, social and governance (ESG) issues.
Three in five trustees have not heard of Clara Pensions, one of two defined benefit (DB) consolidators to have launched since last year's government white paper.
Both New Zealand and Australia are assessing myriad complex pension policy options. David Harris says the UK would do well to study these developments
Inflation in the UK rose slightly in February to 1.9% on the back of higher food prices, according to the Office for National Statistics (ONS).