US - The median performance of pension funds dropped into the negative during the second quarter as public pension plans faired slightly better than their corporate counterparts, according to Wilshire's Trust Universe Comparison Service (TUCS).
While the median performance of all master trusts during the quarter was a poor -0.92%, things looked better over the longer period with one-year performance at a healthy 9.28%.
But the most interesting development was the reversal of fortunes between the corporate and public pension plans. According to TUCS, the median performance of corporate pension plans was 7.63% in 2005, compared to 7.55% for public pension funds.But six months later, it was the public plans with -0.90% for the quarter and 9.44% for the year ending June 30 that came out on top of corporate pension plans, with -0.94% for Q2 and 9.14% for the year.
Hilarie Green, CFA, managing director of Wilshire Analytics’ Performance Reporting division said of the results: “With the large range in returns between asset classes for the one-year period, even slight asset allocation differences made a large contribution to the total return differences between sponsor types.
TUCS is a co-operative effort between Wilshire Analytics, and custodial organisations, and includes plans representing approximately US$2.7trn in assets.By Damian Clarkson
A suite of liability driven investment (LDI) indices has been launched by STOXX and RiskFirst to aid trustees and consultants select, monitor and challenge managers.
British Airways and the trustees of one of its pension schemes are set to argue over the purpose of a pension scheme, leading to an impactful judgment for DB pensions. James Phillips explores the issue
Bank of England governor Mark Carney has said there is still a lot of data to consider before the Monetary Policy Committee (MPC) can decide when to next hike interest rates.
Savers are not squandering their tax-free lump sums under Freedom and Choice but are taking a more cautious approach to retirement, according to Prudential research.