UK - Incentives must be offered to safeguard the future of employer-sponsored pension schemes, the Society of Pension Consultants' new president claims.
Robert Birmingham – an actuary and managing director of Entegria – urged the government to offer “some sort of sweetener” to ease the additional burdens within the Pensions Bill.
Birmingham – who took over the presidency from Aon Consulting head of professional practice Donald Duval in June – does not expect any late amendments.
But he said employer backing was critical to the future of pension provision.
Birmingham added: “There is a lot of additional responsibility and administration in the proposals but no encouragement. Tax relief is the obvious area to concentrate on with financial aspects the prime, although not sole, driver of all of this.
“Granting tax relief to employers who invest over a certain amount in their scheme may be a solution, but in the mean time a few words of encouragement for occupational schemes would go a long way.”
Birmingham believes final salary schemes have “served us well but served their purpose” and sees defined contribution as the future of pension provision.
He said: “DB has become an anachronism – it does not fit with today’s business paradigm. But there is nothing wrong with a good DC plan with a decent rate of contribution and well presented investment options understood by members who subsequently can plan better for retirement.”
Most respondents in this week's Pensions Buzz do not think businesses should be able suspend AE contributions if in financial distress.
Former BHS owner Dominic Chappell has lost the appeal against his section 72 conviction and sentence for failing to hand over information to The Pensions Regulator (TPR).
This week's top stories include Marsh and McLennan Companies agreeing to buy JLT, and the home secretary calling for AE to be scrapped in a no-deal Brexit scenario.
Lesley Titcomb says the watchdog wants closer interactions with pension funds to spot problems sooner and act before having to use its more stringent powers