UK - Most fund managers feel that longer-term mandates would change important aspects of how fund management houses work, new research shows.
A study carried out by Hewitt Bacon & Woodrow found that around 93% of fund managers felt that long term mandates would change key aspects of fund operation.
About 75% of managers surveyed believed that investing for the long-term would result in a greater dialogue between fund managers and investee companies while 72% felt that longer-term mandates would necessitate different risk measures and models. Around 80% thought that investing for the longer-term would give them greater freedom in portfolio construction.
The research was carried out in response to recent government thinking around the need for a more long-term approach to pension fund investments.
Andrew Tunningley, head of UK investment consulting said: “The government are making no secret of their desire to encourage longer-term approaches to pension fund investment. Their hope is that this will stimulate a more informed and influential dialogue between institutional investors and companies in which they invest.”
The findings show that 82% of fund managers believe longer-term mandates would radically overhaul how fund management houses currently work, forcing fund management houses to become more flexible in providing bespoke solutions for clients.
Tunningley said: “The feedback from fund managers suggests that such a move would require them to increase the dialogue with their pension fund clients to provide truly tailored services to match each client’s different liabilities and perspective on risk. Working to a longer-term mandate will afford them the flexibility to engage more with companies.”
The research also revealed that 72% of managers recognise that longer-term mandates would necessitate different risk measures and models, in particular to make a stronger connection with funds’ liabilities rather than index benchmarks.
Fund managers also welcomed performance related fees, with 68% believing that this arrangement would be appropriate if longer term mandates were adopted, forcing a closer alignment of the interests of the fund and the interests of the fund manager.
This week's top stories include Marsh and McLennan Companies agreeing to buy JLT, and the home secretary calling for AE to be scrapped in a no-deal Brexit scenario.
Lesley Titcomb says the watchdog wants closer interactions with pension funds to spot problems sooner and act before having to use its more stringent powers
The Pension Protection Fund (PPF) is consulting on proposals to charge a "risk reflective" levy for commercial defined benefit (DB) consolidation vehicles.
The funding gap across FTSE 350 schemes could be slashed by as much as £275bn if schemes look beyond traditional ways of creating value. Victoria Ticha examines how