Sainsbury's trustees powerless
UK - Neither the trustees of Sainsbury's two pension schemes nor the Pensions Regulator would have the "power" to force a private equity bidder to pay the £3bn needed to plug the supermarket giant's pension deficit, claimed an independent consultant.
John Ralfe, who made his comments through RBC Capital Markets’ Open Forum Notes, claimed that under rule 35 of Sainsbury’s Deed and Rules, the company – and not the trustees as was the case when Permira approached WHSmith in 2004 – sets the contribution rate.
Likewise, Ralfe warned “we should not overstate the powers of the Pensions Regulator”, which would only be able to enforce payment of contributions up to a maximum of the latest IAS19 deficit, which currently stands at £477m.
Ralfe said: “The Trustees must be seen to take a robustly consistent line to protect the interests of their 86,000 members if any bid becomes recommended, or if the company decides to increase its gearing.”
A consortium of investors, led by private equity player CVC, has been given the deadline of April 13 to make a formal offer for the company.
Latest stories
Emerging-markets debt: A new hope
Industry Voice: Sponsored by Eaton Vance
Five stories you may have missed this week
This week's top stories included Cardano announcing plans to acquire Now Pensions from a Dutch pension fund later this year.
RBS reports £100m GMP impact; slashes equity exposure by two thirds
Royal Bank of Scotland (RBS) faces a £102m impact on liabilities as a result of equalising guaranteed minimum pensions (GMPs), according to its annual results.
Back to Top
