UK - Final salary schemes continue to be effective and should not be axed in favour of more high risk solutions, according to consultants William M Mercer.
In a court case scenario held in Edinburgh, over 50 local employers were invited to pass judgement on final salary pension schemes. The seminar, organised by Mercer, aimed to examine the increasing costs of final salary pension schemes and consider whether money purchase schemes were a more effective solution.
The spectacle, which involved jury members, and witnesses for the prosecution and defence, was prompted by the growing number of companies now reviewing whether to continue with their traditional final salary pensions.
The enormous burden of regulation and increasing costs are behind local companies' decisions to examine their current schemes. Many are now reviewing whether other arrangements, such as money purchase and stakeholder pensions, might be more effective in meeting their needs, said Mercer’s Jim Doran.
The seminar concluded that final salary pensions continued to be effective as an employee benefit, and that their cost volatility could be controlled.
Doran added that there was also concern that under other types of pension the financial risks are transferred from employers to employees “who are less well equipped to manage them.
By Madhu Kalia
HMRC has confirmed providers operating relief at source pension schemes can continue to collect automatic tax relief at a basic rate of 20% under new Scottish Income Tax rules.
The Pensions Regulator (TPR) is seeking "improved" powers to set a schedule of contributions in defined benefit (DB) schemes in the government's upcoming white paper, it has revealed.
New regulatory rules which require providers and advisers to produce annuity illustrations will not solve the problem of consumer detriment as they are "fundamentally" flawed, according to Retirement Advantage.
Paul Budgen is set to join financial technology and auto-enrolment (AE) firm Smart Pension as director of business development.