UK - The National Association of Pension Funds is set to launch a major review into the standards used for accounting for pensions.
The trade body said the standards have contributed to the decline in defined benefit provision over the last ten years - which has seen the number of schemes in the private sector remaining open to new members fall from 86% to 23.1%.
It said it would hold an accounting summit later in the year to start the review and to try and find a better method of valuing pensions on company balance sheets and ensuring the survival of defined benefit provision.
NAPF chairman Lindsay Tomlinson said: "Current accounting standards have been very damaging to defined benefit provision, leading many companies to close their schemes.
"Pension funds are long term institutions but today's accounting standards fail to reflect this."
He added: "The NAPF want to find a better approach to pension accounting that balances transparency with a less volatile assessment of assets against long-term liabilities."
This comes just days after Mercer warned proposed changes to international accounting standard IAS19 could wipe £8.7bn (US$13.1bn) off reported company profits.
The consultant said the International Accounting Standards Board had tentatively concluded at public meetings that the "expected return on assets" and "interest cost" finance charges for pensions should be replaced by a net measure of interest income or expense, determined by applying the discount rate to the net defined benefit asset or liability.
It said the standards body was expected to consult in the next few months as part of an updating of the accounting standard for employee benefits that it anticipates will apply with effect from 2013.
The Next Generation Pensions Committee is on a mission to promote and encourage younger voices in the industry. Kim Kaveh looks at its key objectives
This week's top stories included an analysis finding the cost of equalising guaranteed minimum pensions in schemes could hit FTSE 100 profits by up to £15bn.
Employers whose dividend to deficit recovery contribution (DRCs) ratios fall outside the "normal range" should expect to see higher regulatory scrutiny, although no fixed ratio will be set.
Investment consultants and fiduciary managers should expect a final decision on the investigation into the market to be published by the end of the year, the competition watchdog says.