SWEDEN - The Swedish Investment Fund Association (Fondbolagens Förening) has hit back at research suggesting pension investors are often unaware of the charges they are paying.
The report published yesterday by occupational pension specialist Alecta suggests that in the Swedish pensions market "five in six investors are not fully aware of what charges are actually being taken out on their occupational pension."
"An even greater number find it hard to gain oversight into what the charges mean over time. At a level of 2% a third of the retirement capital disappears. At 3.5%, for example, in fund of funds solutions, half disappears," Alecta stated.
Alecta said the problem was particularly acute for those not covered by collective bargaining in the workplace. It called for tougher rules to ensure long term savers were more aware of the costs being deducted from their capital invested - to avoid situations whereby people with similar amounts of capital invested ended up with sharply different pensions in retirement.
However, Pia Nilsson, managing director of the Swedish Investment Fund Association, said that looking at costs alone did not describe the entire situation.
"You can't have price comparisons without also taking account of what you actually get for your money. That is why it is a good idea to show for the past 10 years what both the price and the real increase in value have been," she said.
"What is very important is that when comparing funds the charges are always deducted when returns are shown. That means equivalent returns are always equally good for the fund investor, regardless of what charges have been applied. A higher charge will hit returns. This type of saving is transparent for the investor. It does not apply to other types, for example, traditional life insurance [products], which show returns without reference to charges."
"The Association believes that it would be good for everybody if not only funds can be compared between themselves, but also that other types of savings can be compared."
This week's top stories include ITS' management buyout from Mercer, and The Pensions Regulator launching a probe into single-employer defined contribution schemes' default funds.
People retiring in the UK will on average outlive their pension savings by 10 years, according to research by the World Economic Forum (WEF).
Steps to improve auto-enrolment are uncontroversial and obvious, but the government is dawdling on introducing the necessary changes, argues Jack Jones.
Professional trustees will be expected to apply for accreditation as part of a framework intended to be launched on 1 July by the Professional Trustee Standards Working Group (PTSWG).