• Home
  • Admin/Tech
  • Benefits
  • Buzz
  • DB
  • DC
  • Diversity
  • Investment
  • Law & regulation
  • Risk reduction
  • Events
  • Whitepapers
  • Spotlights
  • Digital Edition
  • PPTV
  • Newsletters
  • Sign in
  •  
      • Newsletters
      • Account details
      • Contact support
      • Sign out
     
    •  

      You are currently accessing ProfessionalPensions via your Enterprise account.

      If you already have an account please use the link below to sign in.

      If you have any problems with your access or would like to request an individual access account please contact our customer service team.

      Phone: +44 (0) 1858 438800

      Email: [email protected]

      • Sign in
  • Follow us
    • Twitter
    • LinkedIn
    • Newsletters
    • YouTube
  • Register
  • Subscribe
  • Events
    • Upcoming events
      event logo
      Webinar: Using passion for ESG to unleash member engagement

      This webinar will look at how pension schemes can harness their members’ interest in ESG to engage them more broadly with their pensions. In particular, it will look at exclusive research showing how members are reacting to ESG; their propensity to act versus their actual behaviour; and the expectations they have of providers in this regard.

      • Date: 26 Jan 2021
      • Webinar
      event logo
      Investment Conference

      This two part Investment Conference will bring you the latest updates from economists, asset managers and pension consultants. We will be taking a look at the outlook for the 2021 economy, alternatives, cashflow strategies and global equity markets to name a few, assessing how they fared through the volatility and what we can expect for the year ahead.

      • Date: 27 Jan 2021
      • Digital Conference
      event logo
      Webinar: What to put on your GMP Equalisation project roadmap for 2021

      This webinar will bring together views from actuaries, lawyers, administrators, trustees and data experts to look at the pragmatic, collaborative solutions that are open to schemes to solve the GMP equalisation challenges in 2021. It will assess the individual challenges schemes face with equalisations and provide some practical options that are available to resolve these issues.

      • Date: 02 Feb 2021
      • Webinar
      event logo
      Webinar: Will the world return to normal in 2021?

      In this webinar, PP editor Jonathan Stapleton will be joined by BMO’s chief economist Steven Bell and director of fiduciary management, Christy Jesudasan, alongside PTL trustee director Melanie Cusack and Isio’s head of fiduciary management oversight Paula Champion to discuss the significant impact of these themes on the pensions sector.

      • Date: 04 Feb 2021
      • Webinar
      View all events
      Follow our Professional Pension Events

      Sign up to receive email alerts about our events

      Sign up

  • Whitepapers
    • How DC schemes can gain exposure to different asset classes in a low-return environment

      So far, DC plans have largely been focused on the onset of auto-enrolment and changes to the regulatory framework - be it the ‘charge cap,' ‘pension freedoms' or consultations around ‘value for money', says Annabel Tonry, Executive Director at J.P. Morgan Asset Management (JPMAM).

      Download
      Pension freedoms three years on

      In 2015 George Osborne, then the UK Chancellor of the Exchequer, decided that those age over 55 could take much more of their pension in cash. This has since opened up a range of possibilities for DC scheme members in the world of pensions.

      Download
      Find whitepapers
      Search by title or subject area
      View all whitepapers
  • Spotlights
  • Digital Edition
Professional Pensions
Professional Pensions
  • Home
  • Admin/Tech
  • Benefits
  • Buzz
  • DB
  • DC
  • Diversity
  • Investment
  • Law & regulation
  • Risk reduction
 
    • Newsletters
    • Account details
    • Contact support
    • Sign out
 
  •  

    You are currently accessing ProfessionalPensions via your Enterprise account.

    If you already have an account please use the link below to sign in.

    If you have any problems with your access or would like to request an individual access account please contact our customer service team.

    Phone: +44 (0) 1858 438800

    Email: [email protected]

    • Sign in
  • Law and Regulation

TPR wants good pensions for all, not just for the few

 Mark Boyle, TPR
Mark Boyle, TPR
  • Mark Boyle
  • 22 December 2016
  • Tweet  
  • Facebook  
  • LinkedIn  
  • Send to  
0 Comments

Following its response to the 21st Century trusteeship and governance discussion paper, chairman Mark Boyle underlines TPR's determination to drive up standards.

Good governance remains the backbone of a well-run pension scheme. 

Yet it is clear from our 21st century trustee research, and our response published last week, that the quality of governance and administration is still not consistent.

Related articles

  • New year, new you? - New Year's (pensions) resolutions
  • Building back better: Hopes and fears for 2021
  • Looking at 2021 in 3D: Debt, deglobalisation and diversity
  • The top 20 opinion articles of 2020

There are many highly experienced, skilled and knowledgeable trustees, and many schemes are managed very effectively. But others are not, and there are some trustees who are not responding to our guidance and calls for higher standards.

Too many occupational pension scheme members and sponsors are suffering financial detriment from poor stewardship, and this is unacceptable.

We are not prepared to accept two classes of member - those that benefit from good governance and administration, and those that do not. All members have the right to expect that their retirement savings benefit from effective stewardship.

Evidence shows that poor stewardship impacts on the funding costs of DB schemes and translates into poor value for money for scheme sponsors. So it's important to acknowledge that poor governance is not a 'victimless' problem.

Driving up standards of trusteeship is a priority for us at TPR. We want to see trustees being a knowledgeable, empowered first line of defence for pension scheme members. As a start we have focused this year on some basic duties - we are taking a tough stance on scheme returns and in the defined contribution (DC) world with chairs statement enforcement, we are imposing fines when schemes do not comply. If trustees are unable to get even these basic legal duties right, it is likely to be symptomatic of more serious failings.

It is clear from our research that an effective chair of trustees and the presence of professional trustees on boards has a positive effect on stewardship. We want to take steps to embed the good practice we see in these well-run schemes more widely.

We already make it clear that we expect higher standards from professional trustees but we will be going further next year by setting out clearly what we expect of a professional trustee in practice. This will lead not only to clarification of our expectations of professionals, but also to clarity about our likely enforcement action when these standards are not met.

Additionally, we will clarify how we define a professional trustee so it is clear to whom these higher standards apply.

We also recognise the important role of lay trustees and have found that the most effective boards have a diversity of skills, points of view and backgrounds to draw upon. So while the chair and a professional trustee can provide a framework for good governance, administration and compliance, good lay trustees can bring a vital practical perspectives and expertise.

In particular we'll be focusing on the roles, responsibilities of the key players, whether it's the chair, professional or independent trustee, other trustees, scheme manager, scheme secretary or adviser.

Educating trustees is at the heart of what we do at TPR. One of the questions we raised in our discussion paper was about whether there should be mandatory qualifications for trustees.

Many respondents thought that mandatory qualifications are not the best way of ensuring and measuring trustee competence. And we agree. We are not currently looking to introduce mandatory qualifications. However, we do want to consider how a ‘fit and proper' regime for trustees could be developed, taking into account what we've learned from master trust authorisation and also from the experience of other regulators in the UK and abroad.

To help trustees achieve higher standards, we intend to use our data much more effectively in order to target our communications. We already communicate to different schemes in different ways, tailoring our methods and tone to the scheme size and type. We will take this segmented approach further. So where we have seen a history of good compliance from a scheme, say with the scheme return, our approach may be lighter.

It means we'll be able to focus our efforts and resources on those schemes that are higher risk. And it means not placing extra burdens on schemes that are well run, but instead to focus on less well-run schemes and trustees that need our support.

We will also place increased focus on the importance of having a balanced range of relevant softer skills such as influencing, negotiating and communicating and consider what more we can do by way of education.

We have a diverse, hugely fragmented and complex occupational pension scheme market. We believe that in some circumstances scheme consolidation may be the most appropriate strategy and we will be looking at a range of potential longer term solutions.

TPR recognises the importance of raising the standards of stewardship across the whole occupational pensions landscape. Being clearer in our expectations of trustees, as well as developing tools to assist them to perform their duties more effectively, will be an area of high focus for us in coming months and through 2017.

Mark Boyle is chairman of The Pensions Regulator

  • Tweet  
  • Facebook  
  • LinkedIn  
  • Send to  
  • Topics
  • Law and Regulation
  • Mark Boyle
  • TPR
  • DC
  • Trustee
  • professional trustees
  • lay trustees
  • TT

More on Law and Regulation

Pension Schemes Bill gets final approval and waits for Royal Assent

The long-debated Pension Schemes Bill has received parliamentary approval, guaranteeing its place on the statute book.

  • Law and Regulation
  • 20 January 2021
DB transfers are on a downward trend
FCA data reveals over £20bn of DB transfers between 2018 and 2020

Some £20.1bn of defined benefit (DB) pensions were advised to transfer between 2018 and 2020, while £10.2bn were recommended not to transfer, Financial Conduct Authority (FCA) data reveals.

  • Law and Regulation
  • 18 January 2021
Amin: The new rules mean trustees will have to be corporate finance experts
Trustees will need to be corporate finance experts under new TPR powers

Pension trustees will have much more involvement in business discussions and corporates will need to think more about pensions when the watchdog’s increased powers come into force, LCP says.

  • Law and Regulation
  • 18 January 2021
Blyth: Anticipating a call for ways to draw a line under disputes
Is mediation set to become the new normal for pension disputes?

Mediation has been under-utilised historically as a means of dispute resolution in this area. Mark Blyth and Geoff Egerton think this is going to change.

  • Law and Regulation
  • 15 January 2021
Fairs: Working through the issues raised from the consultation
TPR response to funding code consultation reveals level of industry concern over twin-track regime

The Pensions Regulator (TPR) has published the interim response to its first defined benefit (DB) funding code consultation – highlighting the depth of industry concern around its proposed twin-track regime.

  • Law and Regulation
  • 14 January 2021
blog comments powered by Disqus
Back to Top

Most read

Trustees will need to be corporate finance experts under new TPR powers
Trustees will need to be corporate finance experts under new TPR powers
Livingbridge sells Broadstone to Intermediate Capital Group
Livingbridge sells Broadstone to Intermediate Capital Group
LGPS to become negative cashflow 'by 2024'
LGPS to become negative cashflow 'by 2024'
Pension Schemes Bill set for final debate next week
Pension Schemes Bill set for final debate next week
Aegon commits to net-zero default funds by 2050
Aegon commits to net-zero default funds by 2050
Trustpilot

 

  • Contact Us
  • Marketing solutions
  • About Incisive Media
  • Terms and conditions
  • Policies
  • Careers
  • Twitter
  • LinkedIn
  • Newsletters
  • YouTube

© Incisive Business Media (IP) Limited, Published by Incisive Business Media Limited, New London House, 172 Drury Lane, London WC2B 5QR, registered in England and Wales with company registration numbers 09177174 & 09178013

Digital publisher of the year
Digital publisher of the year 2010, 2013, 2016 & 2017
Loading