Global Pensions talks to David Morris of GWA about fundamental indexing
Global Pensions: Alternative indices have been garnering interest from institutions in Europe, North America and Asia. Why has this been the case?
David Morris: The need for scale curtails performance of even the best active managers and this has given passive market index tracking a role to play with much lower fees and a fully transparent, stable process.
However, market indexing has not provided the complete answer because it is susceptible to speculative waves. In each of the last three decades, great bubbles occurred in: Japan (1989), the Technology Bubble (1999), and Global Financials (2008/9 – the anti-bubble). When speculators focus upon a few ‘hot’ stocks the relevant market index becomes very concentrated, destroying its diversification.
Furthermore, during periods of market decline, all securities tend to move down together, becoming more correlated. This also reduces diversification.
In my view, the interest in alternative indices comes from the desire to maintain adequate diversification in their core portfolios in order to lower risk.
Global Pensions: With so many different products emerging, what questions should an investor ask when trying to find the best strategy for their portfolio? What risks should they be aware of?
David Morris: Let me say at the outset that in my view alternative indices are not a substitute for the performance benchmark that is the market capitalisation index.
Some people think that the market capitalisation index is flawed and should be replaced with a new index. This makes little sense in my view because the market capitalisation index defines the opportunity set for all investors at any one point in time. It is the ultimate performance target to which we are accountable.
Updating your subscription status
The best of our readers' ideas on how to structure defined ambition pensions
This guide to Pensions Stability explores the new financial and operational model for defined benefit (DB) pension schemes. Pension schemes are still being run with far greater risk than is necessary and there is an opportunity to create a more stable pensions environment for trustees and sponsors.
This inaugural survey among 326 members of the Chartered Institute of Personnel and Development (CIPD) and the Pensions Management Institute (PMI) asked whether auto-enrolment will deliver on its goals; if contribution rates for employees and employers need to rise; and whether pensions tax relief needs further reform.
£day rate based on experience, circa £350 per day
Up to £30,000 per annum (salary will be dependent on experience)
Send to a friend