US - US real estate investment trusts are seeking a bigger piece of the more than $500bn of property investments from pensions, aiming to attract money from the private-equity funds traditionally favored by managers.
The National Association of REITs found that a portfolio 30 percent invested in commercial property shares delivered a higher return relative to one more heavily tilted toward private-equity funds, based on a study to be published today on the group's website. Pension funds typically put less than 10% of their real estate allocations into publicly traded REITs to protect against stock-market volatility.
The Washington-based real estate association, which represents about 200 companies, says that what it calls "the REIT third" can help state and corporate pensions narrow a funding shortfall that totals almost $1.5trn, according to the Center for Retirement Research at Boston College. A bigger REIT allocation, and a smaller one in private equity, would offer better diversification and more consistent returns, said Brad Case, NAREIT's vice president for research.
The trick is in the timing, he said.
"The public side is liquid, so therefore when investors start to get concerned about the future of asset values, they sell their REIT stocks, whereas they can't get out of their private-equity real estate funds," he said in a telephone interview. "That lag is what gives the institutional investor the diversification benefit."
The NAREIT study analyzed 22 years of data encompassing both the 2008 credit crisis and the savings and loan collapse of the early 1990s. It examined REIT returns compared with the three main types of real estate private equity: so-called core funds, which buy properties with mostly cash; high-yield "opportunity" funds, which can use as much as 70% borrowed money and aim to boost returns beyond 20%; and "value-added" funds, which exist between the two.
The study found that a portfolio consisting of 30% REITs, 49% in core private funds and 21% in high- yield funds averaged an 8.2% annual return from 1992 to the third quarter of 2010. A portfolio with 9% REITs and 20% in value-added funds returned 6.7% a year for the same period. The NAREIT-preferred allocation also had a superior Sharpe Ratio, a measurement that seeks to balance volatility with return expectations.
The private and public sides of real estate are contending for slices of what NAREIT estimates is a half-trillion dollar pie, or about 10 percent of the $5.3trn in pension investments.
A portfolio 30% in REITs may add too much risk to the investments, said Mark Roberts, global head of research at Dallas-based Invesco Real Estate, an asset-management company whose property-investment options includes private-equity funds.
"When you're looking at that kind of composition of real estate, what investors need to be mindful of is that is starting to take the leverage level of their real estate portfolio upwards of 40 or 50% or more," he said in a telephone interview. "Relative to, say, an unlevered real estate market, that amount of leverage will double the volatility of returns."
Invesco research shows that about 15% invested in REITs maximizes returns without increasing risk, Roberts said.
The largest, best-known real estate private-equity funds are run by investment banks including Goldman Sachs Group Inc. and Morgan Stanley, as well as asset managers such as Blackstone Group LP, Starwood Capital Group LLC, and AREA Property Partners LP. Many of them made their reputations with high-yield opportunity funds that delivered annual returns of as much as 40% in the late 1990s.
Get the latest news direct to your inbox.
More from US
Updating your subscription status
This Aberdeen Asset Management hedge fund roundtable discusses what investors are looking for in hedge fund governance; lessons that have been learned from the past and how the industry is placed for the future.
The all-new Pensions and Benefits Show will be held on 12th-13th June 2013 at ExCeL, London.
The Pensions Institute provides 15 good practice principles in modelling defined contribution pension plans. These principles cover the issues such as: model specification and calibration, modelling quantifiable uncertainty, modelling member choices and modelling longevity risk.
After what has felt for many like an eternity, auto enrolment has finally arrived. As the UK's largest employers complete the process, now is an ideal time to consider some of the lessons learned so that employers with auto enrolment on the agenda for 2013, can avoid some of the pain and pitfalls that may occur along the way.
This whitepaper provides a checklist to ensure you are compliant with the new legislation.
GBP25000 - 28000 per annum
GBP - 30000 per annum
GBP - 35000 per annum
Send to a friend