Partner Insight: What does bank retrenchment mean for private credit investors?

How cuts to bank lending could grow the asset class

clock • 3 min read
Partner Insight: What does bank retrenchment mean for private credit investors?

Executive summary:

  • After the 2008 global financial crisis (GFC), more stringent regulations led to banks cutting lending. Our research indicates that banks have remained the principal providers of debt financing, although over the last ten years alternative lenders have made meaningful advances, particularly in infrastructure.
  • 2023 saw a return of bank retrenchment following sharp monetary tightening and the banking crisis in the US. In our view, macroeconomic uncertainty is likely to prolong this situation for some time, meaning private credit could grow significantly as a proportion of the broader capital markets

Is bank retrenchment a myth?

The GFC led to the introduction of Basel III, a set of financial reforms aiming to improve banks' abilities to absorb shocks and increase their resilience against potential future crises.  The conventional narrative is that the resulting increase in capital requirements led to banks lending much less than before, creating an opportunity for a growing range of non-bank lenders to fill the gap.

Several academic studies have concluded that although capital requirements do play a role, loan growth is closely linked to macroeconomic conditions.1 During the period in the immediate aftermath of the GFC when banks were adjusting their balance sheets, their contribution to overall credit provision reduced. 

This was far more acute in Europe, where banks' share of the total credit provided to the non-financial sector fell from 65% in 2009 to 55% in 2015, corresponding to a funding gap of around $2 trillion.2 The reduction was less in the US, which has always been a more disintermediated market.

As the global economy recovered, the supply of bank credit rebounded, supported by ultra-loose monetary policies and stronger demand. However, banks' share of overall credit provision has still not returned to its pre-GFC level.

 

Key risks

The value of an investment and any income taken from it is not guaranteed and can go down as well as up, you may not get back the amount you originally invested.

Important information

The views expressed in this document are those of Legal & General Investment Management Limited and/or its affiliates (‘Legal & General', ‘we' or ‘us') as at the date of publication. This document is for information purposes only and we are not soliciting any action based on it. The information above discusses general economic, market or political issues and/or industry or sector trends. It does not constitute research or investment, legal or tax advice. It is not an offer or recommendation or advertisement to buy or sell securities or pursue a particular investment strategy.

No party shall have any right of action against Legal & General in relation to the accuracy or completeness of the information contained in this document.

The information is believed to be correct as at the date of publication, but no assurance can be given that this document is complete or accurate in the light of information that may become available after its publication. We are under no obligation to update or amend the information in this document. Where this document contains third party information, the accuracy and completeness of such information cannot be guaranteed and we accept no responsibility or liability in respect of such information.

This document may not be reproduced in whole or in part or distributed to third parties without our prior written permission. Not for distribution to any person resident in any jurisdiction where such distribution would be contrary to local law or regulation.

© 2023 Legal & General Investment Management Limited, authorised and regulated by the Financial Conduct Authority, No. 119272. Registered in England and Wales No. 02091894 with registered office at One Coleman Street, London, EC2R 5AA.Advertisement

More on Defined Contribution

Well-managed defaults key to ensure late decision-making majority are not penalised

Well-managed defaults key to ensure late decision-making majority are not penalised

Survey finds majority only make pension decisions one year or less before retirement

Jonathan Stapleton
clock 14 May 2024 • 1 min read
Industry backs enrolling employees into schemes at maximum contribution levels

Industry backs enrolling employees into schemes at maximum contribution levels

PP poll finds 56% of respondents favour proposals in paper published by WTW

Martin Richmond
clock 08 May 2024 • 1 min read
Patrick Heath-Lay: Industry not doing enough to make transfers work for members

Patrick Heath-Lay: Industry not doing enough to make transfers work for members

Master trust CEO says VfM metrics should apply across all DC pensions

Patrick Heath-Lay:
clock 02 May 2024 • 4 min read
Trustpilot