• Home
  • Admin/Tech
  • Benefits
  • Buzz
  • DB
  • DC
  • Diversity
  • Investment
  • Law & regulation
  • Risk reduction
  • Events
  • Whitepapers
  • Spotlights
  • Digital Edition
  • PPTV
  • Newsletters
  • Sign in
  •  
      • Newsletters
      • Account details
      • Contact support
      • Sign out
     
    •  

      You are currently accessing ProfessionalPensions via your Enterprise account.

      If you already have an account please use the link below to sign in.

      If you have any problems with your access or would like to request an individual access account please contact our customer service team.

      Phone: +44 (0) 1858 438800

      Email: [email protected]

      • Sign in
  • Follow us
    • Twitter
    • LinkedIn
    • Newsletters
    • YouTube
  • Register
  • Subscribe
  • Events
    • Upcoming events
      event logo
      Webinar: Using passion for ESG to unleash member engagement

      This webinar will look at how pension schemes can harness their members’ interest in ESG to engage them more broadly with their pensions. In particular, it will look at exclusive research showing how members are reacting to ESG; their propensity to act versus their actual behaviour; and the expectations they have of providers in this regard.

      • Date: 26 Jan 2021
      • Webinar
      event logo
      Investment Conference

      This two part Investment Conference will bring you the latest updates from economists, asset managers and pension consultants. We will be taking a look at the outlook for the 2021 economy, alternatives, cashflow strategies and global equity markets to name a few, assessing how they fared through the volatility and what we can expect for the year ahead.

      • Date: 27 Jan 2021
      • Digital Conference
      event logo
      Webinar: What to put on your GMP Equalisation project roadmap for 2021

      This webinar will bring together views from actuaries, lawyers, administrators, trustees and data experts to look at the pragmatic, collaborative solutions that are open to schemes to solve the GMP equalisation challenges in 2021. It will assess the individual challenges schemes face with equalisations and provide some practical options that are available to resolve these issues.

      • Date: 02 Feb 2021
      • Webinar
      event logo
      Webinar: Will the world return to normal in 2021?

      In this webinar, PP editor Jonathan Stapleton will be joined by BMO’s chief economist Steven Bell and director of fiduciary management, Christy Jesudasan, alongside PTL trustee director Melanie Cusack and Isio’s head of fiduciary management oversight Paula Champion to discuss the significant impact of these themes on the pensions sector.

      • Date: 04 Feb 2021
      • Webinar
      View all events
      Follow our Professional Pension Events

      Sign up to receive email alerts about our events

      Sign up

  • Whitepapers
    • How DC schemes can gain exposure to different asset classes in a low-return environment

      So far, DC plans have largely been focused on the onset of auto-enrolment and changes to the regulatory framework - be it the ‘charge cap,' ‘pension freedoms' or consultations around ‘value for money', says Annabel Tonry, Executive Director at J.P. Morgan Asset Management (JPMAM).

      Download
      Pension freedoms three years on

      In 2015 George Osborne, then the UK Chancellor of the Exchequer, decided that those age over 55 could take much more of their pension in cash. This has since opened up a range of possibilities for DC scheme members in the world of pensions.

      Download
      Find whitepapers
      Search by title or subject area
      View all whitepapers
  • Spotlights
  • Digital Edition
Professional Pensions
Professional Pensions
  • Home
  • Admin/Tech
  • Benefits
  • Buzz
  • DB
  • DC
  • Diversity
  • Investment
  • Law & regulation
  • Risk reduction
 
    • Newsletters
    • Account details
    • Contact support
    • Sign out
 
  •  

    You are currently accessing ProfessionalPensions via your Enterprise account.

    If you already have an account please use the link below to sign in.

    If you have any problems with your access or would like to request an individual access account please contact our customer service team.

    Phone: +44 (0) 1858 438800

    Email: [email protected]

    • Sign in
 
  • Investment

Focusing on the 'squeezed middle'

  • Malcolm Jones
  • 18 January 2018
  • Tweet  
  • Facebook  
  • LinkedIn  
  • Send to  
0 Comments

Malcolm Jones of Standard Life Investments answers questions on DC default design and some of the principal challenges for DC providers

How do you believe defined contribution (DC) schemes should balance risk and return in default funds?

Lower-volatility investment default approaches can help improve retirement outcomes in several ways. They can materially reduce the scale of contributions while still giving the same degree of confidence in reaching a particular retirement outcome. In doing so, they can more than justify the higher fees generally associated with this active approach versus cheaper passive alternatives. Additionally, their reduced risk is consistent with behavioural drivers that are shown to improve member engagement and contribution rates.

To what extent is a 'one-default-fits-all' approach still appropriate for DC schemes? Should all DC members be treated equally?

We do not believe a 'one-default-fits-all' approach is appropriate for DC given the breadth of members that can be in the scheme. The wealthiest individuals tend to be most engaged and more commonly recognise the value of seeking investment advice. Insofar as they do, these members will only remain in the default fund if it happens to be relevant and suited to their individual needs. If not, then their wealth is likely to cushion against any adverse long-term consequences. Therefore, orienting default fund design around the needs of this group is arguably less critical to their retirement outcome despite the scale of their savings (which is normally a large part of scheme assets).

At the other end of the wealth scale, despite the prominence of pension issues today, there are many for whom paying into a pension plan remains an unaffordable luxury or otherwise low on a long list of priorities. Minimal contribution rates and low salaries mean that many members will rely primarily on state benefits to provide their retirement income. Any savings they do accumulate in DC pensions will likely make little overall difference to their long-term retirement lifestyle. 

This group is typically not engaged, is unable or unwilling to contribute much above that offered by the employer, and accumulates too few assets to reasonably expect to rely solely on the DC scheme in retirement. Many in this group are likely to take their entire pension pot at retirement, to spend or reduce debt, not to invest. Arguably a lifestyle glide-path that de-risks completely would suit these members, but what of the consequences for others? While there may be many members in this group, their collective assets will represent only a small proportion of the scheme.

Between the other two groups are those who do contribute personally, foregoing consumption today to secure a retirement not solely reliant on the state. For this group, the expense of bespoke advice is unappealing and the ability to make informed personal investment decisions rare. Critically reliant on the quality of the default fund and personally invested to the tune of a large part of scheme assets, it is these members who form the majority of engaged default fund investors. We suggest it is they, the 'squeezed middle', who should be foremost in the minds of those devising the default fund solution.

Should DC plans be responsive to different risk requirements?

While it may be desirable to offer a more personalised approach, it raises the issue of the level of engagement you have with members. If you only have the person's name, age and location it is difficult to establish their requirements. However, if you begin trying to gather more information there is the risk that you begin moving into the area of 'offering advice'.

Can a DC member's investment needs be determined from their behaviour?

This is a question open to numerous interpretations. You may be referring to the research into 'big data' in terms of establishing individual credit ratings. Recently some social media analysts were challenged in using artificial intelligence (AI) to deliver individual credit scores based on people's social media profiles. They found the AI was as good if not better at determining creditworthiness of individuals versus traditional techniques!

To what extent can DC defaults be extended into retirement?

For the growing numbers opting for drawdown, it is vital their assets can generate sufficient growth to provide a sustainable income throughout retirement. This is incompatible with an asset pot consisting largely of cash and bonds at retirement. It is clear the landing site for lifestyle glide-paths needs to be redesigned towards a portfolio more appropriate for drawdown investors. We also need to consider the needs of our 'squeezed middle'. Is their priority a new car, a holiday or sufficient assets to sustain a comfortable standard of living through retirement?

Malcom Jones is an investment director at Standard Life Investments and a senior member of the firm's global investment specialist team, specialising in absolute return and multi-asset investing. He has over 25 years' experience and has led both global fixed income and equity teams as an investment manager.

The value of an investment is not guaranteed and can go down as well as up. An investor may get back less than they invested. Tax rules may change.

To find out more, visit www.standardlifeinvestments.com/dc

  • Tweet  
  • Facebook  
  • LinkedIn  
  • Send to  
  • Topics
  • Investment
  • Defined Contribution
  • Industry Voice
  • SLI
blog comments powered by Disqus
Back to Top
Trustpilot

 

  • Contact Us
  • Marketing solutions
  • About Incisive Media
  • Terms and conditions
  • Policies
  • Careers
  • Twitter
  • LinkedIn
  • Newsletters
  • YouTube

© Incisive Business Media (IP) Limited, Published by Incisive Business Media Limited, New London House, 172 Drury Lane, London WC2B 5QR, registered in England and Wales with company registration numbers 09177174 & 09178013

Digital publisher of the year
Digital publisher of the year 2010, 2013, 2016 & 2017
Loading