![Chris Edwards-Earl: If the ‘without prejudice’ label isn't properly used, the effects can be disastrous Chris Edwards-Earl: If the ‘without prejudice’ label isn't properly used, the effects can be disastrous](https://image.chitra.live/api/v1/wps/0b5e71b/6b7dd8aa-0589-4374-9fb9-3c1f5fc28b66/5/Edwards-Earl-Chris-Stephenson-Harwood-2022-roi-1-679x419.jpg)
Chris Edwards-Earl: If the ‘without prejudice’ label isn't properly used, the effects can be disastrous
There are many occasions in which ‘without prejudice’ discussions, where people are free to make concessions and make settlement offers without fear of prejudicing themselves, can be essential in settling pension disputes.
For example, when trustees are negotiating with employers, when they are pursuing claims against advisors, and when settling claims with employees. Such ‘without prejudice' communications may help ...
To continue reading this article...
Join Professional Pensions
Become a Professional Pensions Lite Member today
- Three complimentary articles per month covering the latest real-time news, analysis and opinion from the industry
- Receive important and breaking news stories via our two daily news alerts
- Hear from industry experts and other forward-thinking leaders