
Chris Edwards-Earl: If the ‘without prejudice’ label isn't properly used, the effects can be disastrous
There are many occasions in which ‘without prejudice’ discussions, where people are free to make concessions and make settlement offers without fear of prejudicing themselves, can be essential in settling pension disputes.
For example, when trustees are negotiating with employers, when they are pursuing claims against advisors, and when settling claims with employees. Such ‘without prejudice' communications may help ...
To continue reading this article...
Join Professional Pensions
- Unlimited access to real-time news, analysis and opinion from the industry
- Receive our in-depth monthly magazine in either print or digital format
- Access our Sustainable Investment Hub covering news and opinion from thought leaders in the ESG space
- Receive important and breaking news stories selected by the Editors in our daily newsletter
- Hear from industry experts and other forward-thinking leaders
- Receive a monthly members-only newsletter with exclusive opinion pieces from leading industry experts and a feature from the magazine in advance of its release date