• Home
  • Admin/Tech
  • Benefits
  • Buzz
  • DB
  • DC
  • Diversity
  • Investment
  • Law & regulation
  • Risk reduction
  • Events
  • Whitepapers
  • Spotlights
  • Digital Edition
  • PPTV
  • Newsletters
  • Sign in
  •  
      • Newsletters
      • Account details
      • Contact support
      • Sign out
     
    •  

      You are currently accessing ProfessionalPensions via your Enterprise account.

      If you already have an account please use the link below to sign in.

      If you have any problems with your access or would like to request an individual access account please contact our customer service team.

      Phone: +44 (0) 1858 438800

      Email: [email protected]

      • Sign in
  • Follow us
    • Twitter
    • LinkedIn
    • Newsletters
    • YouTube
  • Register
  • Subscribe
  • Events
    • Upcoming events
      event logo
      WSB Webinar: Tackling financial wellbeing in the workplace

      This webinar will explore how employers can help employees take control of their finances through the provision of financial education and guidance. It will look at how such financial education programmes should be delivered to ensure maximum engagement as well as the content such offerings should include.

      • Date: 23 Feb 2021
      • Webinar
      event logo
      Webinar - LGIM Climate Solutions: how we measure climate risk and alignment in investors’ portfolios

      As investors move to incorporate a greater focus on climate change into their portfolios, there is an increasing requirement to be able to quantify and report on the climate credentials of investments and to what extent they are aligned with the goals of the Paris Agreement.In this webinar, LGIM explain how they quantify portfolio alignment with the Paris goals, using a combination of historical and forward-looking measures.

      • Date: 24 Feb 2021
      • Webinar
      event logo
      Admin & Data Forum 2021

      This concise half-day event will explore a variety of different issues affecting scheme managers, through a combination of informative presentations and interactive panel debates, including GMP equalisation, the pensions dashboard, the accuracy and quality of members data and the latest trends in scheme administration.

      • Date: 04 Mar 2021
      event logo
      Defined Benefit Consolidation Conference

      Professional Pensions is hosting this concise digital event on the 25th March to provide a crucial update on where the current regulation stands on DB Consolidators, assess the different models available, what the expected funding levels are and the governance requirements. This event will be a combination of short presentations followed by live Q&A’s with our expert speakers allowing plenty of time to answer your questions.

      • Date: 25 Mar 2021
      • Digital Conference
      View all events
      Follow our Professional Pension Events

      Sign up to receive email alerts about our events

      Sign up

  • Whitepapers
    • How DC schemes can gain exposure to different asset classes in a low-return environment

      So far, DC plans have largely been focused on the onset of auto-enrolment and changes to the regulatory framework - be it the ‘charge cap,' ‘pension freedoms' or consultations around ‘value for money', says Annabel Tonry, Executive Director at J.P. Morgan Asset Management (JPMAM).

      Download
      Pension freedoms three years on

      In 2015 George Osborne, then the UK Chancellor of the Exchequer, decided that those age over 55 could take much more of their pension in cash. This has since opened up a range of possibilities for DC scheme members in the world of pensions.

      Download
      Find whitepapers
      Search by title or subject area
      View all whitepapers
  • Spotlights
  • Digital Edition
Professional Pensions
Professional Pensions
  • Home
  • Admin/Tech
  • Benefits
  • Buzz
  • DB
  • DC
  • Diversity
  • Investment
  • Law & regulation
  • Risk reduction
 
    • Newsletters
    • Account details
    • Contact support
    • Sign out
 
  •  

    You are currently accessing ProfessionalPensions via your Enterprise account.

    If you already have an account please use the link below to sign in.

    If you have any problems with your access or would like to request an individual access account please contact our customer service team.

    Phone: +44 (0) 1858 438800

    Email: [email protected]

    • Sign in
  • Industry

Why the industry fears 'ISA pensions'

Industry responds to wide-ranging consultation

  • Natasha Browne
  • 09 July 2015
  • Tweet  
  • Facebook  
  • LinkedIn  
  • Send to  
0 Comments

The government has opened a wide-reaching consultation on reforming pensions tax relief. Natasha Browne hears the industry's response

At a glance
  • The government is consulting on whether the pensions tax relief system should be reformed 
  • The industry thinks ISA-style pensions would lead to poorer outcomes 
  • There is potential for further tinkering on the annual and lifetime allowances

 

Not content with unleashing the biggest shake up of retirement saving in decades less than 18 months ago, this week George Osborne launched a consultation on completely overhauling pensions tax relief.

Related articles

  • Woodford investors to receive third payment on 26 August as annual reports delayed again
  • How multi-national companies are providing pensions for mobile workforces
  • Mineworkers and British Coal schemes succeed in a rare US securities fraud class action case
  • Have investment managers improved their ESG approaches?

The aim is to create a more sustainable pension system by promoting saving and addressing the issue of improved life expectancies. Delivering the summer Budget on 8 July, Osborne said he was "open to further radical change" on the accumulation side.

The consultation is wide reaching, inviting industry leaders to recommend a variety of ways the system could be improved. It also acknowledges that the current EET - exempt, exempt, taxed - system may not be the most appropriate model. This is where tax relief is given on contributions and investment income, with the benefit is taxed in retirement instead.

Osborne said pensions could be taxed like ISAs. This would be the TEE - taxed, exempt, exempt - model. People be would contribute from their after tax income but the pension would be tax-free at decumulation. There could also be a government top-up in the middle.

The consultation - Strengthening the incentive to save: a consultation on pensions tax relief - coincides with confirmation that the annual allowance will be cut for higher earners on at least £150,000 a year. This measure was originally published in the Conservative's pre-election manifesto.

Workers would effectively lose 50p of annual allowance for every extra pound earned between £150,000 and £210,000. Somebody at the top end of this income range would have a yearly allowance of just £10,000. The Institute for Fiscal Studies (IFS) previously raised concern the plan would bring forward tax receipts rather than necessarily increase them.

Industry pundits also warned the cuts could deter people from saving into a pension and make the system more complex. But the green paper notes that further changes to the annual and lifetime allowances could actually improve the system.

There is also the potential to implement former pensions minister Steve Webb's idea of single rate tax relief of 30%. He said this would encourage lower earners to save, unlike the current system which gives a greater in incentive to higher earners.

One organisation in favour of this approach is Hargreaves Lansdown. Head of pensions research Tom McPhail says: "If the Treasury simply started treating pensions like ISAs it risks undermining the existing (and very important) incentives to make long-term retirement savings, which is why this is a consultation and not a policy announcement.

"If reform is inevitable (and it probably is) then our preferred answer is something close to Steve Webb's model of a flat rate incentive for all, combined with the abolition of the lifetime allowance.

Another advocate of scrapping the lifetime allowance is current pensions minister Ros Altmann.

In her former guise as the older workers champion, Altmann was vocal about removing the lifetime allowance for defined contribution (DC) savers. This would prevent "penalising" savers if the value of their pots grew strongly, she argued in her personal blog.

The ISA pension

The industry is likely to propose a vast range of tax relief changes in the consultation. But Osborne was careful in his wording when delivering his Budget speech. He made a specific comparison with ISAs, and this has caught the imagination of most commentators. It is also a policy idea that has been floated by the Centre for Policy Studies (CPS).

CPS fellow Michael Johnson has estimated such a move could net the Treasury £10bn a year. A long-standing critic of the current tax relief system, Johnson has said the EET model was "patently failing the next generation".

Experts have welcomed the consultation, acknowledging that tax relief is ripe for reform. But many question the suitability of an ISA approach. The National Association of Pension Funds (NAPF) chief executive Joanne Segars says the government was wise not to rush into wider reforms.

However, she adds: "For this review to succeed it must look at taxation of pensions in the bigger picture of what genuinely incentivises people to save consistently over the long-term for their retirement.

"Major changes in the taxation of pensions, such as a move to TEE, ask savers to believe a future government will be able to keep the promises made by a Chancellor today. And when it comes to the rules governing pension taxation, experience shows events rarely turn out that way."

Like Segars, Aon Hewitt senior partner Kevin Wesbroom is worried that political wrangling on pensions would compromise the chance of long-term stability.

He says: "This would appear to be a genuine consultation on whether the pension tax system needs to change, rather than how the system should be changed. But we cannot ignore the influence of the fiscal imperative to get a suitable outcome in terms of tax revenue."

Wesbroom proposes a ‘buy one, get one free' model, also championed by Johnson, where the tax relief is converted to an explicit addition to the pension pot. He says this has "high intuitive appeal" but the price would be the switch to ISA-style taxation.

Wesbroom adds: "This switches the tax timing for a generation, and would have huge appeal to the Treasury. Individuals may have less confidence in trusting future governments to honour promises on maintaining the tax-free nature of pension pay outs."

Pinsent Masons partner Simon Laight agrees tax relief needs to be simplified and that the ISA model is already well-understood. But he argues against moving towards ‘ISA pensions'.

Laight says: "Moving to an ISA tax system brings forward tax receipts for the Exchequer. It also takes higher rate tax relief away from all higher rate taxpayers but only gives tax relief at that rate to those of them whose pensions would also be taxed at the higher rate.

"Let's hope that the stated aim of incentivising people to save isn't a Trojan Horse precipitating a more general raid on pensions."

Society of Pension Professionals president Duncan Buchanan asks whether existing pension savings would be taxable under the current system or the ISA regime if the landscape changes.

Buchanan says: "Over the last 20 years, the pension system in the UK, where contributions and investment returns are exempt from tax but the emerging pension benefit is taxable (apart from the lump sum), has steadily been eroded- first by restricting tax relief on investment income and then by significantly restricting contribution levels.

"Pensions are a long-term investment and, unlike ISAs, benefits cannot be withdrawn before a minimum age. If pensions start to be taxed like ISAs it is likely that most people would prefer the flexibility (and better reputation) of an ISA over a pension product so where would this leave auto-enrolment?"

Towers Watson senior consultant David Robbins says the proposal would effectively abolish the tax-free lump sum. The effects of this are unclear because there is no guidance on what the government top-up would be.

Robbins says: "Depending on how cheap the government wanted the new system to be, basic-rate taxpayers could conceivably gain. But everyone would have to trust future tax-hungry governments not to come back to their pension pots for a second helping."

Norton Rose Fulbright senior knowledge lawyer Lesley Harrold says a switch from EET to TEE would take time to adjust to.

She adds: "I'm not sure in the long run how fair that would be because most people, I think we can assume, earn or have a lower income in retirement than they did during their working years.

"They'd be foregoing whatever rate of tax relief they would have had under the current system on their contributions and only getting relief on the way out at the lower rate."

Eight questions the government wants answered:
  1. To what extent does the complexity of the current system undermine the incentive for individuals to save into a pension? 
  2. Do respondents believe that a simpler system is likely to result in greater engagement with pension saving? If so, how could the system be simplified to strengthen the incentive for individuals to save into a pension? 
  3. Would an alternative system allow individuals to take greater personal responsibility for saving an adequate amount for retirement, particularly in the context of the shift to defined contribution pensions? 
  4. Would an alternative system allow individuals to plan better for how they use their savings in retirement? 
  5. Should the government consider differential treatment for defined benefit and defined contribution pensions? If so, how should each be treated? 
  6. What administrative barriers exist to reforming the system of pensions tax, particularly in the context of automatic enrolment? How could these best be overcome? 
  7. How should employer pension contributions be treated under any reform of pensions tax relief?
  8. How can the government make sure that any reform of pensions tax relief is sustainable for the future?

  • Tweet  
  • Facebook  
  • LinkedIn  
  • Send to  
  • Topics
  • Industry
  • defined benefit
  • defined contribution
  • George Osborne
  • Michael Johnson
  • NAPF
  • Summer Budget 2015
  • ISAs

More on Industry

The best of PP's news from 15-19 February, 2021.
Five stories you may have missed this week

This week’s top stories included the release of new guidance from the GMP Equalisation Working Group, while Zedra acquired pensions executive support provider Inside Pensions.

  • Industry
  • 19 February 2021
A quarter of schemes do not have an adequate cybercrime breach plan
Pension schemes 'underprepared' to combat cybercrime and fraud

UK pension funds are “underprepared” to combat the risks of cybercrime and fraud, according to research by Crowe.

  • Industry
  • 19 February 2021
The report sets out areas where further support, guidance or intervention could be beneficial
PPI and Phoenix warn joint industry approach is needed if climate change goals are to be reached

The Pensions Policy Institute (PPI) and Phoenix Group have warned a joint approach is needed across the pensions industry and the government to improve scheme engagement with climate change.

  • Industry
  • 18 February 2021
The UK recorded a compound annual growth rate of 4.6% in the last decade and is now the third largest global pension market, having slipped behind Japan during a difficult 2020.
World's largest pension markets show Covid resilience; UK drops to third place

The UK recorded a compound annual growth rate of 4.6% in the last decade and is now the third largest global pension market, having slipped behind Japan during a difficult 2020.

  • Industry
  • 17 February 2021
Excess deaths in week five of 2021 were 5,526 higher than if mortality rates had been the same in 2019, bringing the total number since the start of the pandemic to more than 100,000.
CMI: Excess deaths surpass 100,000

Excess deaths in week five of 2021 were 5,526 higher than if mortality rates had been the same in 2019, bringing the total number since the start of the pandemic to more than 100,000.

  • Industry
  • 17 February 2021
blog comments powered by Disqus
Back to Top

Most read

Updated: GMP Equalisation Working Group publishes guidance on tax issues
Updated: GMP Equalisation Working Group publishes guidance on tax issues
Deutsche Bank agrees £570m buy-in with L&G
Deutsche Bank agrees £570m buy-in with L&G
Zedra acquires Inside Pensions
Zedra acquires Inside Pensions
TPR flexes powers after 8,200 quarterly AE breach increase
TPR flexes powers after 8,200 quarterly AE breach increase
Investment management 'not fit for purpose' in delivering sustainable wealth creation
Investment management 'not fit for purpose' in delivering sustainable wealth creation
Trustpilot

 

  • Contact Us
  • Marketing solutions
  • About Incisive Media
  • Terms and conditions
  • Policies
  • Careers
  • Twitter
  • LinkedIn
  • Newsletters
  • YouTube

© Incisive Business Media (IP) Limited, Published by Incisive Business Media Limited, New London House, 172 Drury Lane, London WC2B 5QR, registered in England and Wales with company registration numbers 09177174 & 09178013

Digital publisher of the year
Digital publisher of the year 2010, 2013, 2016 & 2017
Loading