Tax hikes vital to meet spending promises, says IFS
Taxes will have to increase after the March Budget if the government plans to honour the spending plans in outlined last year, the Institute for Fiscal Studies (IFS) has warned.
This comes as chancellor Rishi Sunak - who replaced Sajid Javid on 13 February - finalises policy proposals ahead of delivering his first Budget after just 27 days in office.
The IFS has labelled Sunak's Budget as "the most significant fiscal event in years" and said the new government would struggle to deliver on its promises without hiking taxes.
Reports have continued to circulate about a potential cut to pensions tax relief for high earners from 40% to 20% to "equalise" the system - a proposal which has faced strong Conservative opposition.
IFS director Paul Johnson said: "This Budget will set the direction of policy for the next five years and if this new government is going to make radical changes to taxes and spending, surely this is the time to do it."
While the state of that proposal remains unknown in the wake of Javid's resignation, Johnson said there are better options to improve taxation than to cut contribution relief.
"The chancellor is hemmed in by a rising deficit and fiscal targets set out in the conservative manifesto. They will allow him to increase investment spending, which will be welcome if well targeted, but they will not allow substantial increases in current spending, or tax cuts, to be funded by more borrowing," he said.
"We have already had 16 fiscal targets in a decade, and fiscal targets should not just be for Christmas [and] Sunak should resist the temptation to announce another and instead recognise that more spending must require more tax."
As an alternative, the IFS' Budget preview suggests the reduction of the pensions tax-free lump sum.
The economic think-tank said the government should consider that "plenty of tax rises" remain, raising revenue from better-off individuals and improving "the coherence of the tax system".
The IFS said: "Restricting pensions tax relief to the basic rate would increase the income tax bills of precisely the group (those with annual incomes of £50,000 and over) for whom Boris Johnson pledged income tax cuts prior to becoming prime minister.
"Continuing to freeze fuel duty would cost another £4bn a year (in today's terms) by the end of the parliament, on top of the £6bn a year that real-terms reductions since 2010 are already costing."
Tax relief is one concern for the pensions industry in a long list of proposals that it has called for the government to address, including changes to the tapered annual allowance and net-pay schemes.
More on Law and Regulation
Gina Miller calls for review of Andrew Bailey's appointment at BoE
Gina Miller has published a report highlighting "regulatory failures" in financial services during Andrew Bailey's tenure as chief executive (CEO) of the Financial Conduct Authority (FCA), calling for chancellor Rishi Sunak to review Bailey’s appointment...
The PPF levy impact of the change from Experian to D&B
The PPF is changing its insolvency risk provider as part of a triennial review of its levy rules. Lewys Curteis looks at how this could impact schemes.
It's simple… Scammers destroy lives
The industry needs more powers to protect savers by stopping scams in their tracks, but a network to share intel can help, says Margaret Snowdon.
UPDATE: DWP outlines climate risk mitigation expectations to TPR
The Department for Work and Pensions (DWP) has called on The Pensions Regulator (TPR) to deepen its research on its planned regulatory approach to tackling climate-related risks and how it would manage any opportunities from climate change.
The real concerns about the transition to CPIH
The transition from RPI to CPIH could have a significant impact on pension funds. However, as Con Keating says, the real challenges of this shift may come from an unexpected area.
Most read
