Ian Bell – Cross-party approach to pensions needed

Longer-term approach would allow people to plan for retirement with greater certainty

Jonathan Stapleton
clock • 2 min read
Ian Bell: The current approach fails to recognise that we have a slow burning crisis building
Image:

Ian Bell: The current approach fails to recognise that we have a slow burning crisis building

The next government should form a cross-party working group to address pension issues, RSM UK says.

The audit and advisory firm's head of pensions Ian Bell said saving for retirement was a long game – but noted the current approach, where pensions policy depends on who is in government, encourages short-termism.

He said: "We'd like to see a cross-party working group established which would enable people to plan for retirement with greater certainty.

"Auto-enrolment (AE) is a great example of what can be achieved when all parties work together to address pensions issues. It's been successful in ensuring the majority of workers save into a pension, however it doesn't go far enough in terms of the amount saved. The current approach of automatically saving 8% of salary lulls workers into a false sense of security and means they often don't stop to consider how much they should really be saving. Many are unaware that the 8% of salary saved into pensions under auto enrolment is unlikely to be enough to guarantee a comfortable retirement. 

"We'd also like to see a commitment to better financial literacy, so younger generations understand that saving for retirement is not just an older person's issue. Raising the 8% AE amount has already been acknowledged as necessary, however, as it's unlikely to prove a vote winner, particularly in the current economic climate, no parties are addressing it directly in their manifestos.

"The current approach fails to recognise that we have a slow burning crisis building that will come back to haunt retirees and governments in years to come, unless all-party action is taken to resolve it."

This article was published as part of Professional Pensions' PP Pensions Commission – which is looking to bring together industry opinion and ideas on the future of pensions ahead of the general election on 4 July.

Send your thoughts and ideas to the PP Pensions Commission via email to [email protected].

More on Industry

SPP: Inclusive futures?

SPP: Inclusive futures?

Daniel Gerring looks at how the SPP is inspiring positive change across the industry and beyond

Daniel Gerring
clock 13 January 2026 • 4 min read
News Digest: 320,000 pensioners hit with four-figure 'retirement tax' bills

News Digest: 320,000 pensioners hit with four-figure 'retirement tax' bills

PP brings together all the latest news on pensions from across the national and financial media

Professional Pensions
clock 13 January 2026 • 1 min read
Buzz: Is shifting to a four-point rating system for VfM a positive move?

Buzz: Is shifting to a four-point rating system for VfM a positive move?

VfM framework, rule changes around IHT on pensions and New Year’s resolutions

Professional Pensions
clock 12 January 2026 • 1 min read
Trustpilot