Ian Bell – Cross-party approach to pensions needed

Longer-term approach would allow people to plan for retirement with greater certainty

Jonathan Stapleton
clock • 2 min read
Ian Bell: The current approach fails to recognise that we have a slow burning crisis building
Image:

Ian Bell: The current approach fails to recognise that we have a slow burning crisis building

The next government should form a cross-party working group to address pension issues, RSM UK says.

The audit and advisory firm's head of pensions Ian Bell said saving for retirement was a long game – but noted the current approach, where pensions policy depends on who is in government, encourages short-termism.

He said: "We'd like to see a cross-party working group established which would enable people to plan for retirement with greater certainty.

"Auto-enrolment (AE) is a great example of what can be achieved when all parties work together to address pensions issues. It's been successful in ensuring the majority of workers save into a pension, however it doesn't go far enough in terms of the amount saved. The current approach of automatically saving 8% of salary lulls workers into a false sense of security and means they often don't stop to consider how much they should really be saving. Many are unaware that the 8% of salary saved into pensions under auto enrolment is unlikely to be enough to guarantee a comfortable retirement. 

"We'd also like to see a commitment to better financial literacy, so younger generations understand that saving for retirement is not just an older person's issue. Raising the 8% AE amount has already been acknowledged as necessary, however, as it's unlikely to prove a vote winner, particularly in the current economic climate, no parties are addressing it directly in their manifestos.

"The current approach fails to recognise that we have a slow burning crisis building that will come back to haunt retirees and governments in years to come, unless all-party action is taken to resolve it."

This article was published as part of Professional Pensions' PP Pensions Commission – which is looking to bring together industry opinion and ideas on the future of pensions ahead of the general election on 4 July.

Send your thoughts and ideas to the PP Pensions Commission via email to [email protected].

More on Industry

Average pension transfer took just 11 days at tax year end, Origo finds

Average pension transfer took just 11 days at tax year end, Origo finds

Origo says transfer times decreased around tax year end with half taking seven days or less

Jasmine Urquhart
clock 17 June 2025 • 1 min read
TPR sets out how its industry innovation service has 'already started delivering'

TPR sets out how its industry innovation service has 'already started delivering'

Service has allowed watchdog to help industry build solutions with savers ‘at the heart’

Holly Roach
clock 17 June 2025 • 2 min read
Buzz: Do the minimum training requirements for trustees need to be increased?

Buzz: Do the minimum training requirements for trustees need to be increased?

Trustee training requirements, deferred members and government economic ambitions

Professional Pensions
clock 17 June 2025 • 1 min read
Trustpilot