PAG urges MPs to back bill amendment to index pre-97 FAS pension rights

Campaign group says amendment would address ‘major social injustice’

Jonathan Stapleton
clock • 2 min read
The House of Commons Public Bill Committee will begin its scrutiny of the Pension Schemes Bill next week.
Image:

The House of Commons Public Bill Committee will begin its scrutiny of the Pension Schemes Bill next week.

The Pensions Action Group has urged MPs to back a Pension Schemes Bill amendment to index pre-1997 Financial Assistance Scheme (FAS) pension rights.

Next week, the House of Commons Public Bill Committee will begin its scrutiny of the Pension Schemes Bill.

While the bill currently includes a number of provisions relating to the Pension Protection Fund (PPF) and FAS, PAG says it fails to introduce indexation for FAS members' pre-1997 pensionable service – a move that was recommended, where original schemes had provided for this, in the Work and Pensions Committee's third report on defined benefit (DB) pension schemes last March, potentially using some of the multi-billion pound PPF reserves to do this.

PAG said it understands various MPs and members of the Lords will introduce an amendment to the Pension Schemes Bill to remedy this situation – saying it now needed "every MP to support the amendment".

FAS provides compensation to members of DB schemes who lost all or part of their pension if their scheme came to an end between 1 January 1997 and 5 April 2005. PAG says the lack of pre-1997 indexation meant, however, that many FAS members in their 70's and 80's were now receiving 50% or less than they had expected.

PAG said the cost of paying pre-1997 indexation at 2.5% per annum would cost £13m per year on an ongoing basis for the next ten years – adding that, as the average age of FAS recipients is now 73, it expected there would be a considerable decline in costs during and after that period.

In a statement, PAG said: "In the last few months, we have lost so many FAS members and to delay and continually ignore this major social injustice remains both financially and morally wrong, and devastating to the individuals affected, and their spouses.

"We implore the minister to act immediately to correct this major injustice. Confidence in pensions savings is at an all-time low, and the country needs some reassurance that when workers save for their retirement their savings will be safe and secure!"

More on Law and Regulation

PPI - Too much or not enough? The Pensions Commission's low earners dilemma

PPI - Too much or not enough? The Pensions Commission's low earners dilemma

John Upton says low earners are a group that is particularly vulnerable to undersaving.

John Upton
clock 03 July 2026 • 4 min read
FCA consults on proposals to support stronger SIPP market standards

FCA consults on proposals to support stronger SIPP market standards

Watchdog says it aims to improve consistency and adequacy of due diligence

Jonathan Stapleton
clock 22 June 2026 • 1 min read
Will pension firms become subject to a robot tax?

Will pension firms become subject to a robot tax?

Matthew Giles looks at how taxing the ‘labour’ performed by AI would impact pensions

Matthew Giles
clock 18 June 2026 • 3 min read
Trustpilot