• Home
  • Admin/Tech
  • Benefits
  • Buzz
  • DB
  • DC
  • Diversity
  • Investment
  • Law & regulation
  • Risk reduction
  • Events
  • Whitepapers
  • Spotlights
  • Digital Edition
  • PPTV
  • Newsletters
  • Sign in
  •  
      • Newsletters
      • Account details
      • Contact support
      • Sign out
     
    •  

      You are currently accessing ProfessionalPensions via your Enterprise account.

      If you already have an account please use the link below to sign in.

      If you have any problems with your access or would like to request an individual access account please contact our customer service team.

      Phone: +44 (0) 1858 438800

      Email: [email protected]

      • Sign in
  • Follow us
    • Twitter
    • LinkedIn
    • Newsletters
    • YouTube
  • Register
  • Subscribe
  • Events
    • Upcoming events
      event logo
      Investment Conference

      This two part Investment Conference will bring you the latest updates from economists, asset managers and pension consultants. We will be taking a look at the outlook for the 2021 economy, alternatives, cashflow strategies and global equity markets to name a few, assessing how they fared through the volatility and what we can expect for the year ahead.

      • Date: 29 Jan 2021
      • Digital Conference
      event logo
      Webinar: What to put on your GMP Equalisation project roadmap for 2021

      This webinar will bring together views from actuaries, lawyers, administrators, trustees and data experts to look at the pragmatic, collaborative solutions that are open to schemes to solve the GMP equalisation challenges in 2021. It will assess the individual challenges schemes face with equalisations and provide some practical options that are available to resolve these issues.

      • Date: 02 Feb 2021
      • Webinar
      event logo
      Webinar: Will the world return to normal in 2021?

      In this webinar, PP editor Jonathan Stapleton will be joined by BMO’s chief economist Steven Bell and director of fiduciary management, Christy Jesudasan, alongside PTL trustee director Melanie Cusack and Isio’s head of fiduciary management oversight Paula Champion to discuss the significant impact of these themes on the pensions sector.

      • Date: 04 Feb 2021
      • Webinar
      event logo
      Webinar: Investing for the transition to net-zero

      Pension schemes are now facing increasing government, regulatory, and member demand to manage the financial risks associated with the anthropogenic consequences of the environmental crisis. But how best to manage this transition to net-zero? And, in the rush to invest in carbon friendly assets, are investors potentially missing out on potential returns generated by the transition theme, investing in assets that may not be carbon neutral but have the potential to significantly improve their environmental credentials over time. This webinar will discuss at the transition theme, look at the opportunity set available and ask how this can help schemes achieve superior returns while moving towards a net-zero portfolio.

      • Date: 11 Feb 2021
      • Webinar
      View all events
      Follow our Professional Pension Events

      Sign up to receive email alerts about our events

      Sign up

  • Whitepapers
    • How DC schemes can gain exposure to different asset classes in a low-return environment

      So far, DC plans have largely been focused on the onset of auto-enrolment and changes to the regulatory framework - be it the ‘charge cap,' ‘pension freedoms' or consultations around ‘value for money', says Annabel Tonry, Executive Director at J.P. Morgan Asset Management (JPMAM).

      Download
      Pension freedoms three years on

      In 2015 George Osborne, then the UK Chancellor of the Exchequer, decided that those age over 55 could take much more of their pension in cash. This has since opened up a range of possibilities for DC scheme members in the world of pensions.

      Download
      Find whitepapers
      Search by title or subject area
      View all whitepapers
  • Spotlights
  • Digital Edition
Professional Pensions
Professional Pensions
  • Home
  • Admin/Tech
  • Benefits
  • Buzz
  • DB
  • DC
  • Diversity
  • Investment
  • Law & regulation
  • Risk reduction
 
    • Newsletters
    • Account details
    • Contact support
    • Sign out
 
  •  

    You are currently accessing ProfessionalPensions via your Enterprise account.

    If you already have an account please use the link below to sign in.

    If you have any problems with your access or would like to request an individual access account please contact our customer service team.

    Phone: +44 (0) 1858 438800

    Email: [email protected]

    • Sign in
  • Defined Benefit

LPFA: Wandsworth performance claims miss the point

Mike Taylor hits back in the row over merging local government pension funds

  • Mike Taylor
  • 22 March 2013
  • Tweet  
  • Facebook  
  • LinkedIn  
  • Send to  
0 Comments

We were very disappointed to witness the recent press campaign from Wandsworth Council, which sought to undermine our proposed initiative to create a pooled London pension fund by attacking the London Pension Fund Authority's investment record.

Not only did Wandsworth's arguments miss the point, but they also relied on a disingenuous presentation of the data (PP Online, 15 March - www.professionalpensions.com/2255157 and www.professionalpensions.com/2255151).

First, the LPFA's proposal is not based on a comparison of the performance of smaller funds with that of the LPFA, but is in fact concerned with the benefits of a larger fund across London. There is compelling evidence to suggest that larger funds are much more cost effective than smaller funds. A report published in October 2012 by PwC, for example, highlighted potential savings of £120m per annum across London's £24bn combined pension funds. This works out as an annual saving of £359 for every single household in the capital.

Related articles

  • Talk of a dashboard delay is 'just plain wrong'
  • Con Keating: Buzz views show true depth of DB funding code disquiet
  • New year, new you? - New Year's (pensions) resolutions
  • Building back better: Hopes and fears for 2021

Other advantages of larger funds, identified by the Centre for Policy Studies, include: the ability to harvest economies of scale and exercise leverage on investment price; the ability to afford the in-house expertise needed to analyse and research the increasingly complex range of available investments, and identify the better performing funds; and the ability to take advantage of co-investment opportunities, reducing fees.

In addition, larger funds have lower administration costs. According to CPS research fellow Michael Johnson, a scheme with more than 50,000 members costs just £15-£30 per member, compared with £200 for a scheme with fewer than 1,000 members. Many other studies, worldwide, corroborate this argument.

The LPFA's contention is that larger funds perform better because they have access to better expertise and better liability management and liability hedging tools that smaller funds do not. Also, larger funds are able to invest at scale in funds that take advantage of illiquidity premia such as infrastructure, private equity and housing. These asset classes also match our liability profile well.

Wandsworth stated that it would be "nearly £100m worse off" if its pension fund had been invested with the LPFA over the last three years. Wandsworth's three-year performance is strong because the fund is predominantly invested in equities, which have performed well during that period but it is nothing more than a moment-in-time snapshot.

Invested over longer, more indicative time horizons, Wandsworth's performance compares poorly with that of the LPFA. Over ten years, Wandsworth would be £50m better off under the LPFA (the LPFA Pensioner Fund has returned 6.7%, compared with Wandsworth's 6.1%), and over five years it would be £110m better off (LPFA: 7.3%; Wandsworth: 4.7%). The investment returns comparison by Wandsworth also avoids any discussion of risk and liabilities; in other words it looks at only half the picture.

We are not suggesting an LPFA takeover, nor are we trying to impose the LPFA's strategy on to other funds. We are proposing a more cost-effective solution for all 34 funds in order to achieve better value for money for London's taxpayers. This is something all funds should be in favour of and something that recession-weary taxpayers are crying out for.

Mike Taylor is Chief Executive of the LPFA

  • Tweet  
  • Facebook  
  • LinkedIn  
  • Send to  
  • Topics
  • Defined Benefit
  • LGPS
  • Wandsworth
  • LGPS consolidation
  • Mike Taylor

More on Defined Benefit

The schemes have been in assessment since 2019
Boohoo acquisition of Debenhams leaves schemes with PPF

The Debenhams brand and website has been acquired by online fashion retailer Boohoo for £55m, although the pension scheme, shops, and stock will not be purchased.

  • Defined Benefit
  • 25 January 2021
Keating: "The regulator would be well advised to follow their stated course of action".
Con Keating: Buzz views show true depth of DB funding code disquiet

Con Keating says last week’s Pensions Buzz survey indicates the true feeling of directly affected schemes to The Pensions Regulator’s DB funding code proposals.

  • Defined Benefit
  • 25 January 2021
USS chief executive Bill Galvin has warned about the impact of Covid-19
USS: Cost of scheme is 'growing challenge' as future returns 'likely to be lower'

The Universities Superannuation Scheme (USS) trustee board has warned investment returns will be lower in the future than expected as it edges closer to concluding its 2020 valuation.

  • Investment
  • 20 January 2021
XPS's Red Flag index 'reached a record high in December with 76% of transfers showing at least one warning sign of a potential scam.
Pension transfer values end volatile year 8% up; Scam 'red flags' at record high

Pension transfer values ended 2020 at £259,000, 8% higher than the start of the year, according to XPS Pensions, after suffering periods of substantial volatility linked to the pandemic while potential scams reached record highs.

  • Defined Benefit
  • 19 January 2021
This comes after TPR published its interim response to the consultation
TPR's long-term funding approach 'will put extra financial pressure' on scheme sponsors

The Pensions Regulator’s (TPR) long-term funding approach will put extra financial pressure on UK pension scheme sponsors, according to Aon.

  • Defined Benefit
  • 15 January 2021
blog comments powered by Disqus
Back to Top

Most read

L&G agrees £400m deal with own scheme
L&G agrees £400m deal with own scheme
Mark Stocker dies following cancer battle
Mark Stocker dies following cancer battle
PLSA unveils six policy board appointments
PLSA unveils six policy board appointments
Boohoo acquisition of Debenhams leaves schemes with PPF
Boohoo acquisition of Debenhams leaves schemes with PPF
Think tank floats Aviva-backed lower income-focused retirement target framework
Think tank floats Aviva-backed lower income-focused retirement target framework
Trustpilot

 

  • Contact Us
  • Marketing solutions
  • About Incisive Media
  • Terms and conditions
  • Policies
  • Careers
  • Twitter
  • LinkedIn
  • Newsletters
  • YouTube

© Incisive Business Media (IP) Limited, Published by Incisive Business Media Limited, New London House, 172 Drury Lane, London WC2B 5QR, registered in England and Wales with company registration numbers 09177174 & 09178013

Digital publisher of the year
Digital publisher of the year 2010, 2013, 2016 & 2017
Loading