• Home
  • Admin/Tech
  • Benefits
  • Buzz
  • DB
  • DC
  • Diversity
  • Investment
  • Law & regulation
  • Risk reduction
  • Events
  • Whitepapers
  • Spotlights
  • Digital Edition
  • PPTV
  • Newsletters
  • Sign in
  •  
      • Newsletters
      • Account details
      • Contact support
      • Sign out
     
    •  

      You are currently accessing ProfessionalPensions via your Enterprise account.

      If you already have an account please use the link below to sign in.

      If you have any problems with your access or would like to request an individual access account please contact our customer service team.

      Phone: +44 (0) 1858 438800

      Email: [email protected]

      • Sign in
  • Follow us
    • Twitter
    • LinkedIn
    • Newsletters
    • YouTube
  • Register
  • Subscribe
  • Events
    • Upcoming events
      event logo
      Investment Conference

      This two part Investment Conference will bring you the latest updates from economists, asset managers and pension consultants. We will be taking a look at the outlook for the 2021 economy, alternatives, cashflow strategies and global equity markets to name a few, assessing how they fared through the volatility and what we can expect for the year ahead.

      • Date: 20 Jan 2021
      • Digital Conference
      event logo
      Webinar: Using passion for ESG to unleash member engagement

      This webinar will look at how pension schemes can harness their members’ interest in ESG to engage them more broadly with their pensions. In particular, it will look at exclusive research showing how members are reacting to ESG; their propensity to act versus their actual behaviour; and the expectations they have of providers in this regard.

      • Date: 26 Jan 2021
      • Webinar
      event logo
      Webinar: What to put on your GMP Equalisation project roadmap for 2021

      This webinar will bring together views from actuaries, lawyers, administrators, trustees and data experts to look at the pragmatic, collaborative solutions that are open to schemes to solve the GMP equalisation challenges in 2021. It will assess the individual challenges schemes face with equalisations and provide some practical options that are available to resolve these issues.

      • Date: 02 Feb 2021
      • Webinar
      event logo
      Webinar: Will the world return to normal in 2021?

      In this webinar, PP editor Jonathan Stapleton will be joined by BMO’s chief economist Steven Bell and director of fiduciary management, Christy Jesudasan, alongside PTL trustee director Melanie Cusack and Isio’s head of fiduciary management oversight Paula Champion to discuss the significant impact of these themes on the pensions sector.

      • Date: 04 Feb 2021
      • Webinar
      View all events
      Follow our Professional Pension Events

      Sign up to receive email alerts about our events

      Sign up

  • Whitepapers
    • How DC schemes can gain exposure to different asset classes in a low-return environment

      So far, DC plans have largely been focused on the onset of auto-enrolment and changes to the regulatory framework - be it the ‘charge cap,' ‘pension freedoms' or consultations around ‘value for money', says Annabel Tonry, Executive Director at J.P. Morgan Asset Management (JPMAM).

      Download
      Pension freedoms three years on

      In 2015 George Osborne, then the UK Chancellor of the Exchequer, decided that those age over 55 could take much more of their pension in cash. This has since opened up a range of possibilities for DC scheme members in the world of pensions.

      Download
      Find whitepapers
      Search by title or subject area
      View all whitepapers
  • Spotlights
  • Digital Edition
Professional Pensions
Professional Pensions
  • Home
  • Admin/Tech
  • Benefits
  • Buzz
  • DB
  • DC
  • Diversity
  • Investment
  • Law & regulation
  • Risk reduction
 
    • Newsletters
    • Account details
    • Contact support
    • Sign out
 
  •  

    You are currently accessing ProfessionalPensions via your Enterprise account.

    If you already have an account please use the link below to sign in.

    If you have any problems with your access or would like to request an individual access account please contact our customer service team.

    Phone: +44 (0) 1858 438800

    Email: [email protected]

    • Sign in
  • Law and Regulation

Why salary sacrifice cuts could just be the start of National Insurance relief restrictions

  • Jonathan Stapleton
  • Jonathan Stapleton
  • @jonstapleton
  • 22 June 2015
  • Tweet  
  • Facebook  
  • LinkedIn  
  • Send to  
0 Comments

Salary sacrifice may have become a target for government cuts. Jonathan Stapleton explains why.

At the beginning of June, Steve Webb warned that the Conservative government may be considering restrictions on salary sacrifice in a bid to save money.

Speaking at a conference, the former pensions minister said he would be "very surprised" if Treasury "squirrels" were not already working on the subject - saying that changes could reduce the £15bn cost of the salary sacrifice regime. Such changes, he believed, could be made sooner rather than later.

Related articles

  • New year, new you? - New Year's (pensions) resolutions
  • Building back better: Hopes and fears for 2021
  • Looking at 2021 in 3D: Debt, deglobalisation and diversity
  • The top 20 opinion articles of 2020

But what is the true cost of salary sacrifice - and from where did the £15bn figure cited by Steve Webb come?

The last time I checked, both HM Treasury and HM Revenue and Customs said that they had no idea what the cost of these arrangements was. That is because there is no requirement for employers or employees to report salary sacrifice arrangements and no information about how benefit packages would change if these sorts of arrangements were not in place.

But the Office for National Statistics does put a number on the national insurance (NI) relief on employer pension contributions - and, in a memorandum item in its PEN 6 pension statistics, calculates such relief was worth about £14bn in the 2013/14 tax year. This figure is made up of several components.

The bulk of this is national insurance relief that both employers and employees receive on pension scheme contributions even if they do not have a formal salary sacrifice arrangement in place.

This is because employers currently get NI relief for the contributions they make. In addition to this, as employer contributions are not treated as part of an individual's gross income, employees do not have to pay NI contributions on this either.

What are the chances?
According to people close to HM Treasury, this figure is made up of about £9.5bn of employer NIC reliefs and £5.5bn of employee NIC reliefs. But the employee relief figure also includes an estimate for salary sacrifice relief.

So if we take the £14bn figure as the total cost of both NI relief on pensions and salary sacrifice schemes, what are the chances the government will make changes to the current regime?

The real question, however, is: what other options does the government realistically have? It has already ruled out a range of tax rises and spending cuts so we should ask if there is anywhere else it can make savings.

Removal or restriction of national insurance tax breaks on employer pension contributions could be a very easy win for a government looking to balance the books - it would be relatively easy to collect and it could be politically pain-free in comparison to some of the alternatives.

Indeed, in last year's Autumn Statement, the chancellor highlighted this as an area of concern - saying HM Treasury would take measures to prevent "payments of benefits in lieu of salary", a statement that caused some uncertainty.

At the time of the announcement, Jelf Employee Benefits head of benefits strategy Steve Herbert said the announcement was "deliberately cloudy" - and he wondered if it was part of a move to deter employers and employees from using the scheme.

Broader reform of NIC rebates would also pave the way for any move to merge income tax and national insurance - something that has been considered by the Conservative government in the past.

However, such a move could have a huge impact on the UK pensions and benefits system - forcing many employers to reconsider pension contribution rates and review the broader benefits they provide staff. Whether this will deter the government from taking action is quite another matter.

  • Tweet  
  • Facebook  
  • LinkedIn  
  • Send to  
  • Topics
  • Law and Regulation
  • National Insurance
  • salary sacrifice

More on Law and Regulation

DB transfers are on a downward trend
FCA data reveals over £20bn of DB transfers between 2018 and 2020

Some £20.1bn of defined benefit (DB) pensions were advised to transfer between 2018 and 2020, while £10.2bn were recommended not to transfer, Financial Conduct Authority (FCA) data reveals.

  • Law and Regulation
  • 18 January 2021
Amin: The new rules mean trustees will have to be corporate finance experts
Trustees will need to be corporate finance experts under new TPR powers

Pension trustees will have much more involvement in business discussions and corporates will need to think more about pensions when the watchdog’s increased powers come into force, LCP says.

  • Law and Regulation
  • 18 January 2021
Blyth: Anticipating a call for ways to draw a line under disputes
Is mediation set to become the new normal for pension disputes?

Mediation has been under-utilised historically as a means of dispute resolution in this area. Mark Blyth and Geoff Egerton think this is going to change.

  • Law and Regulation
  • 15 January 2021
Fairs: Working through the issues raised from the consultation
TPR response to funding code consultation reveals level of industry concern over twin-track regime

The Pensions Regulator (TPR) has published the interim response to its first defined benefit (DB) funding code consultation – highlighting the depth of industry concern around its proposed twin-track regime.

  • Law and Regulation
  • 14 January 2021
Opperman: No-one should find their hard-earned pension savings eaten away by charges
DWP sets de-minimis for flat-fee AE charges and launches work to standardise cost reporting

The Department for Work and Pensions (DWP) will ban the charging of flat fees on AE auto-enrolment (AE) pots below £100 and launch work on how to standardise cost and charges reporting.

  • Law and Regulation
  • 13 January 2021
blog comments powered by Disqus
Back to Top

Most read

Trustees will need to be corporate finance experts under new TPR powers
Trustees will need to be corporate finance experts under new TPR powers
Livingbridge sells Broadstone to Intermediate Capital Group
Livingbridge sells Broadstone to Intermediate Capital Group
LGPS to become negative cashflow 'by 2024'
LGPS to become negative cashflow 'by 2024'
Pension Schemes Bill set for final debate next week
Pension Schemes Bill set for final debate next week
Aegon commits to net-zero default funds by 2050
Aegon commits to net-zero default funds by 2050
Trustpilot

 

  • Contact Us
  • Marketing solutions
  • About Incisive Media
  • Terms and conditions
  • Policies
  • Careers
  • Twitter
  • LinkedIn
  • Newsletters
  • YouTube

© Incisive Business Media (IP) Limited, Published by Incisive Business Media Limited, New London House, 172 Drury Lane, London WC2B 5QR, registered in England and Wales with company registration numbers 09177174 & 09178013

Digital publisher of the year
Digital publisher of the year 2010, 2013, 2016 & 2017
Loading