The pensions minister Guy Opperman says the interim regime for superfunds will provide insights on the route towards a permanent, longer-term legislative solution.
The consolidation of defined benefit pension schemes into "superfunds" has the potential to deliver more secure retirement incomes for workers, while allowing employers to concentrate on what they do best - running their businesses.
That's why I welcome The Pensions Regulator's (TPR) interim regime for defined benefit (DB) superfunds as a significant step towards a healthier and stronger pensions landscape.
This guidance, and the learning from the experiences of early transactions, will provide valuable insights as we work towards finalising a permanent superfund regime.
Superfunds provide an opportunity for DB pension schemes to benefit from improved funding, economies of scale, better governance and a substantial capital buffer, increasing member security.
Properly managed, they have the potential to improve the likelihood of pension scheme members getting their benefits in full, while also providing employers who are unable to secure an insurance buyout with a new affordable option to manage their liabilities.
In exchange for a significant upfront payment, employers are released from their legacy pension obligations with schemes benefiting from the improved security and professionalism a superfund aims to provide.
But to enable these superfunds to operate effectively, they need clarity on how they are expected to function. TPR's interim regime will help ensure that this emerging market develops in a controlled manner, with clear standards within an appropriate framework.
It will mean the regulator has a much firmer basis to take action against a superfund, should they deem it a necessary and proportionate step. If at any point it appears that changes to the interim regime are required, the government and TPR will take prompt, robust action.
Whilst the publication of interim guidance is a positive step, I must enforce the message that this is an interim regime. Market participants should not assume that the permanent regime will automatically replicate the interim one.
The interim guidance will remain under review to ensure that it is properly protecting and advancing the interests of pension scheme members and the Pension Protection Fund (PPF).
The government is committed to continuing to develop a permanent regime, which may include an alternative set of conditions, including more prudent requirements. This legislation will be subject to full and proper scrutiny and we cannot pre-empt the parliamentary process
But while I can't guarantee exactly what the future regime will look like, I can commit to this: it will be designed to protect pension scheme members and the PPF, including by ensuring that superfunds have the necessary flexibility to continue contributing to a strong pensions ecosystem, in which sponsoring companies and scheme trustees have a range of options open to them.
We look forward to learning from the experiences from the interim regime which will provide valuable insights as we develop and finalise our plans for a longer-term legislative solution.
Today marks another significant step in the right direction for UK pensions: a step towards transforming retirement saving for the benefit of the industry, savers and wider society.
Guy Opperman is minister for pensions and financial inclusion
Aviva Life & Pensions has concluded an £875m buy-in with its own staff pension scheme, following on from a similar transaction last year.
Nearly every trustee is confident of the next stage in their scheme’s strategy, despite almost an equal number being forced to consider replacing plans within the prior 12 months, according to research by Barnett Waddingham.
Companies could be overstating their pension liabilities by up to £60bn due to their life expectancy assumptions, according to XPS Pensions Group.
Just Group has completed a £74m pensioner buy-in with the UK pension scheme of a US-listed engineering business.
Defined benefit (DB) schemes that provide GMPs must revisit and, where necessary, top-up historic cash equivalent transfer values (CETVs) that have been calculated on an unequal basis, a landmark court judgment said last week.