NILGOSC leads way on finding death benefits solution after losing Brewster case
The Northern Ireland Local Government Officers' Superannuation Committee (NILGOSC) is building consensus on what the landmark Brewster judgement means for the awarding of death benefits to unmarried couples.
NILGOSC, which administers the scheme, will hold a meeting with public sector funds next month to discuss the Brewster ruling and broader questions about how schemes should award death benefits.
It is urging schemes to co-operate and think hard about how death benefits are awarded in light of the judgement.
Speaking exclusively to PP, NILGOSC chairman Trevor Salmon (pictured above) said it was important to hear from other scheme representatives about whether they were affected by similar issues and rulings.
"We have accepted the judgement without reservation but the government has been silent on the matter of the case and we would like to build a consensus on the way forward. The purpose of this meeting is to discuss the impact of the Brewster decision.
"There might be other cases where the awarding of death benefits to surviving partners of unmarried couples may arise. This is not a straightforward issue."
A big part of the discussion will focus on how schemes should treat the nomination form, which was required by local government schemes so they could award a deceased member's pension to the surviving cohabitee.
In the Brewster case, the Supreme Court determined the nomination requirement for a surviving cohabitee to receive a pension is unnecessary.
Salmon added: "Many of the civil service schemes were relying on these nomination forms but what will be put in their place? How do schemes deal with these cases?"
The conference will take place on 27 April at the Park Avenue Hotel in Belfast, and will be attended by The Pensions Regulator and The Pensions Ombudsman.
PP has examined the implications of the Brewster decision for private sector schemes.More on Defined Benefit
Updated: Landmark GMP ruling 'significant challenge' for schemes
Defined benefit (DB) schemes that provide GMPs must revisit and, where necessary, top-up historic cash equivalent transfer values (CETVs) that have been calculated on an unequal basis, a landmark court judgment said last week.
FCA must stop DB transfer history repeating
Regulators must act now to impose some "proper regulation" to stop another defined benefit (DB) transfer advice disaster, saysTim Sargisson.
DB funds as an economic lever could derail schemes from responsibilities
Opportunities for defined benefit (DB) schemes to pursue investment approaches that help repair the UK’s economy cannot stand in the way of improving member outcomes, Aegon says.
DB transfer activity rises as 60% show signs of possible scams
More members transferred out of defined benefit (DB) pension schemes in October after September's record lows while values were surprisingly stable, according to XPS Pensions Group's Transfer Watch.
Funding negotiations in uncertain times
Joanna Smith says trustees will need to accurately identify if covenant issues are short-term affordability concerns, or the start of more material deterioration.
Most read
