Lord Flight: Brexit will allow us to dump EU pensions legislation

Michael Klimes
clock • 1 min read

A Tory peer believes European Union (EU) pensions legislation will "fall away" when Brexit materialises and argues London has a bright future.

Lord Howard Flight (pictured), a politician with strong ties to the City of London, made the remark at the Association of Member Nominated Trustees' (AMNT) autumn conference on 21 September.

He believes legislation for example around guaranteed minimum pension (GMP) equalisation and funding of defined benefit (DB) schemes to buyout level will not be implemented.

He said: "I happen to think those will fall away because it seems to me to be completely crazy for us to implement a regime which was then going to be unwound a few months later. My expectation is we won't implement them."

The main benefit of leaving the EU would be a financial one for DB schemes as "increasing material deficits further" through potential full funding requirements is "not really in line with UK thinking on the matter", he added.

On the matter of DB accounting standards, Flight criticised the current methodology.

"The accounting standard is completely barking. It is completely crazy to use a rate of interest which is a function of false bond yields and excessive quantitative easing money creation. It is complete nonsense. A reasonable approach is to look at what the portfolios have done and what returns have been over a period of time."

Regarding the future of the City of London following the UK's decision to leave the EU, Flight was bullishly optimistic.

"London freed-up can attract a lot more business internationally. From a near term perspective, equivalency passporting is going to be the route, which deals with most of the access issues. My vision of London is what I call a super Singapore to be a truly low tax, low cost financial capital, which it is today and I think it will remain."

More on Law and Regulation

The importance of pension comms being 'private and confidential'

The importance of pension comms being 'private and confidential'

Richard Bacon and Jeremy Goodwin look at the learnings from Farley v Paymaster

Richard Bacon and Jeremy Goodwin
clock 08 May 2024 • 4 min read
Robin Ellison: Regulators and revolution

Robin Ellison: Regulators and revolution

PP’s regular columnist looks at a series of pushbacks against excessive regulation

Robin Ellison
clock 07 May 2024 • 12 min read
Legal Review: The benefits and tax implications of scheme surplus rules

Legal Review: The benefits and tax implications of scheme surplus rules

Jonathan Hazlett looks at how trustees and employers can approach surpluses

Jonathan Hazlett
clock 30 April 2024 • 4 min read
Trustpilot