The cross-industry GMP Equalisation Working Group has published guidance outlining methods schemes could use to equalise for the sex based inequalities of GMPs.
The guidance follows on from the group's call to action in July and puts forward good practice suggestions as to how schemes may achieve GMP equality and suggests how they should deal with common issues that can arise when implementing an equalisation project.
It has been developed over the last nine months by a group of pension professionals representing the actuarial and legal professions as well as pension managers and administrators who have pooled their collective experience.
Chairman of the sub-group responsible for preparing the methodology guidance Duncan Buchanan commented: "The court's judgment in the Lloyds Bank case last October means schemes know for sure that they must adjust members' benefits to correct the inequalities in GMPs between males and females earned in the period 17 May 1990 to 5 April 1997.
"While the Court helpfully approved a number of methods to achieve GMP equality, many technical issues remain unanswered. These issues are unlikely to be subject to judicial consideration but need to be addressed by schemes implementing GMP equality."
He added: "The GMP Equalisation Working Group was established to help schemes achieve GMP equality in a cost effective, proportionate and pragmatic way. For most members any changes to benefits will be modest and not all members will need an adjustment. This guidance note puts forward "good practice" suggestions as to how schemes may achieve GMP equality."
The Pensions Regulator executive director for regulatory policy, analysis and advice David Fairs welcomed the guidance. He said: "Choosing a methodology, and tackling some of the more complex, technical issues, are critical steps in achieving GMP equalisation."
Pensions Ombudsman Anthony Arter also welcomed the guidance. He said: "The guidance note outlines good practice on achieving GMP equality. It will be a useful reference for us when reviewing complaint cases."
Further guidance from the working group will be issued in the coming months - covering data, impacted transactions and tax. The group intends to update its guidance in the future to reflect developments such as the outcome of the next instalment of the Lloyds Bank case and any guidance from HMRC on tax implications.
LCP’s Ella Purkiss was the winner of the PMI's second student essay competition. In her paper, she sets out her ideas as to what the industry can learn from other sectors when designing and delivering the pensions dashboard.
The lack of clarity from HM Revenue and Customs (HMRC) on guaranteed minimum pension (GMP) equalisation is “no excuse” for stalling implementation, says Aon.
The Department for Work and Pensions (DWP) has launched a consultation setting out proposals for the adoption and launch of simpler annual benefit statements. Holly Roach reports
There is still no available guidance for trustees on how to incorporate cyber security risks in their investment and stewardship processes, according to NEST.
The quality and availability of data is the “weakest link” for the pensions dashboard, according to the Society of Pension Professionals (SPP).