• Home
  • Admin/Tech
  • Benefits
  • Buzz
  • DB
  • DC
  • Diversity
  • Investment
  • Law & regulation
  • Risk reduction
  • Events
  • Whitepapers
  • Spotlights
  • Digital Edition
  • PPTV
  • Newsletters
  • Sign in
  •  
      • Newsletters
      • Account details
      • Contact support
      • Sign out
     
    •  

      You are currently accessing ProfessionalPensions via your Enterprise account.

      If you already have an account please use the link below to sign in.

      If you have any problems with your access or would like to request an individual access account please contact our customer service team.

      Phone: +44 (0) 1858 438800

      Email: [email protected]

      • Sign in
  • Follow us
    • Twitter
    • LinkedIn
    • Newsletters
    • YouTube
  • Register
  • Subscribe
  • Events
    • Upcoming events
      event logo
      Investment Conference

      This two part Investment Conference will bring you the latest updates from economists, asset managers and pension consultants. We will be taking a look at the outlook for the 2021 economy, alternatives, cashflow strategies and global equity markets to name a few, assessing how they fared through the volatility and what we can expect for the year ahead.

      • Date: 20 Jan 2021
      • Digital Conference
      event logo
      Webinar: Using passion for ESG to unleash member engagement

      This webinar will look at how pension schemes can harness their members’ interest in ESG to engage them more broadly with their pensions. In particular, it will look at exclusive research showing how members are reacting to ESG; their propensity to act versus their actual behaviour; and the expectations they have of providers in this regard.

      • Date: 26 Jan 2021
      • Webinar
      event logo
      Webinar: What to put on your GMP Equalisation project roadmap for 2021

      This webinar will bring together views from actuaries, lawyers, administrators, trustees and data experts to look at the pragmatic, collaborative solutions that are open to schemes to solve the GMP equalisation challenges in 2021. It will assess the individual challenges schemes face with equalisations and provide some practical options that are available to resolve these issues.

      • Date: 02 Feb 2021
      • Webinar
      event logo
      Webinar: Will the world return to normal in 2021?

      In this webinar, PP editor Jonathan Stapleton will be joined by BMO’s chief economist Steven Bell and director of fiduciary management, Christy Jesudasan, alongside PTL trustee director Melanie Cusack and Isio’s head of fiduciary management oversight Paula Champion to discuss the significant impact of these themes on the pensions sector.

      • Date: 04 Feb 2021
      • Webinar
      View all events
      Follow our Professional Pension Events

      Sign up to receive email alerts about our events

      Sign up

  • Whitepapers
    • How DC schemes can gain exposure to different asset classes in a low-return environment

      So far, DC plans have largely been focused on the onset of auto-enrolment and changes to the regulatory framework - be it the ‘charge cap,' ‘pension freedoms' or consultations around ‘value for money', says Annabel Tonry, Executive Director at J.P. Morgan Asset Management (JPMAM).

      Download
      Pension freedoms three years on

      In 2015 George Osborne, then the UK Chancellor of the Exchequer, decided that those age over 55 could take much more of their pension in cash. This has since opened up a range of possibilities for DC scheme members in the world of pensions.

      Download
      Find whitepapers
      Search by title or subject area
      View all whitepapers
  • Spotlights
  • Digital Edition
Professional Pensions
Professional Pensions
  • Home
  • Admin/Tech
  • Benefits
  • Buzz
  • DB
  • DC
  • Diversity
  • Investment
  • Law & regulation
  • Risk reduction
 
    • Newsletters
    • Account details
    • Contact support
    • Sign out
 
  •  

    You are currently accessing ProfessionalPensions via your Enterprise account.

    If you already have an account please use the link below to sign in.

    If you have any problems with your access or would like to request an individual access account please contact our customer service team.

    Phone: +44 (0) 1858 438800

    Email: [email protected]

    • Sign in
 
  • Insurance

Early insurer engagement and the de-risking endgame

  • Amrit McLean
  • 16 October 2018
  • Tweet  
  • Facebook  
  • LinkedIn  
  • Send to  
0 Comments

Amrit McLean of Aviva considers an alternative approach to liability management exercises

The arrival of freedom and choice in 2015 served as something of a 'big bang' moment for pension flexibility. While new rules revolutionised the landscape, it could be argued other areas of the pensions process remain in need of significant reform. 

This is particularly the case when it comes to de-risking and the underwriting of liability management exercises (LMEs). LMEs continue to be popular tools for trustees and sponsors as they help to reduce the size and level of risk in their pension schemes, while simultaneously offering members benefit flexibility.

Yet often the process of conducting LMEs is lengthy and complex, and done in conjunction with buyout timeframes and pressures. 

The norm is for these exercises to be undertaken in the run up to a bulk annuity transaction, to provide insurers with a clean and more insurer-friendly data set that can help attract better pricing and competition from bidding insurers.

However, the inherent problem with this process is the time taken to run it, and a large possibility that trustees could find themselves missing out on potentially favourable market conditions. Indeed, the time taken to conduct an LME could, while making the scheme more attractive to insurers, be self-defeating if it means missing the real target of an affordable buyout - e.g. if liabilities fall by 5% but market conditions increase premiums by 10%, a pricing opportunity has passed the scheme by.

It doesn't have to be this way; disruption to the pensions landscape is on the rise and many schemes are looking to move to buyout earlier by working more closely with insurers to underwrite take-up rates for LMEs as part of a wider transaction. As an insurer, why not underwrite LME take up rates and allow them to be run concurrently with transacting a bulk annuity?

Why do it this way... 

alt=''

When you can do it this way:

alt=''

It is an approach we believe has begun to gain traction in recent months for a number of reasons, namely that it has the added benefit of giving certainty to trustees and sponsors at the point of transaction, whilst take-up risk is passed on to insurers at no extra cost. There will of course be potential winners and losers in this and, while not for all schemes, this could be the difference between a bulk annuity deal and no deal. 

By partnering with an insurer, there are benefits for:

alt=''

However, there are several considerations that trustees and sponsors must think about before undertaking LMEs with insurers as well. 

What take up rates can be expected?

Aviva research suggests that typical rates for Enhanced Transfer Value/Flexible Retirement Options are around 15%, while Pension Increase Exchanges are roughly double that amount (see chart 1). 

Chart 1: Typical Take Up Rates 

alt=''

Of course, actual take up rates will depend on scheme-specific factors such as the level of the LME offering, quality of communications and the experience of the adviser.

How are sponsors incentivised?

Given the fact the exercise is underwritten by the insurer, sponsors need to remain incentivised via contractual obligations to ensure member communications are effective and successful. 

Manage reputational risk?

Reputation can be managed via the insurer if it has adequate input into the offer being tabled as well as input into the communication with members. At Aviva for example, we require a commitment from parties that the exercise complies with the 2012 Code of Good Practice on Incentive Exercises.  

Buyout costing?

The insurer needs to think about the assumptions underlying the buyout cost for members who decline the offer, whilst also considering the difference between the scheme transfer value basis and its own buyout pricing basis. This is particularly important as transfer values may look more attractive to single members rather than married members and could skew take-up rates.

Having seen the real benefits that underwriting LMEs can have, we at Aviva now regard them as a fundamental part of our de-risking solutions for defined benefit pension schemes. And with pension freedoms having kick-started the process of insurers working more closely with trustees at various stages of the buy-out process, there is no reason why the next stage of pensions evolution shouldn't focus on trustees approaching de-risking in a more holistic and transparent way with an insurer partner. 

Such a partnership could not only provide specific assurances to trustees, but we believe would lead to a better organised de-risking process that is, crucially, able to provide much needed cost-certainty. 

By Amrit McLean, sales and proposition director, Defined Benefit Solutions, Aviva

Glossary:

alt=''

  • Tweet  
  • Facebook  
  • LinkedIn  
  • Send to  
  • Topics
  • Insurance
  • engagement
  • Aviva
  • Aviva Investors
blog comments powered by Disqus
Back to Top
Trustpilot

 

  • Contact Us
  • Marketing solutions
  • About Incisive Media
  • Terms and conditions
  • Policies
  • Careers
  • Twitter
  • LinkedIn
  • Newsletters
  • YouTube

© Incisive Business Media (IP) Limited, Published by Incisive Business Media Limited, New London House, 172 Drury Lane, London WC2B 5QR, registered in England and Wales with company registration numbers 09177174 & 09178013

Digital publisher of the year
Digital publisher of the year 2010, 2013, 2016 & 2017
Loading