UK - The debate over control of pension fund surpluses has been reignited by David Yeadle of the EEF manufacturers' association who called for companies to be allowed access to the cash.
Yeadle warned that companies could pay too much to schemes in deficit only to create a surplus they cannot touch.
He added: “We need a serious debate before that happens on any scale, on what might be done because it will be easier to have a sensible discussion now then when the surpluses are there.”
Despite a survey by Aon Consulting last month, other leading consultants were reluctant to comment on the matter.
Some said on a fiduciary level they were against the calls, but allowing companies access to the surplus could make corporations’ balance sheets easier to manage and help them to run more efficiently.
Aon Consulting’s head of employer advice, Paul McGlone, said when the survey was released: “While employers and trustees have spent a lot of energy in recent years dealing with downside risk, the upside risk cannot be forgotten.”
He added: “Employers need to take a more complete view of pensions risk management.”
Measures to allow companies access to unnecessary surpluses are to be considered as part of an ongoing government review.
In March, Global Pensions reported that many companies were creating devices to minimise the risk of trapped surpluses.
Royal London has announced that group chief executive Phil Loney has decided to stand down by the end of 2019.
Crashing out of the European Union without a deal could cause a 37% increase in the aggregate buyout deficit for defined benefit (DB) schemes, says Cardano.
Brunel Pension Partnership has launched its authorised contractual scheme (ACS) and first sub-fund managing around £1.6bn of UK equities.
NEST's director of business development Helen Dowsey speaks to James Phillips about communications, sidecar savings, and retirement products.