UK - Local authority leaders fear a crisis if they are unable to manage pension scheme deficits, a new survey shows.
More than 85% of senior executives cite pension scheme deficits as their greatest concern and slightly more – 87% – are worried about the implications deficits could have for the local authority as a whole.
The study – carried out by fund manager SEI Investments – also shows that local authorities are dissatisfied with the advice provided by existing advisers. A total of 62% said they were told things they already knew, while over half said their advisers tended to be reactive rather than proactive.
The majority felt they spent too much time on the process of hiring and firing investment managers and three-quarters believed the process cost too much.
When asked how the management of their pension fund could be improved, 93% said the process should focus more on qualitative manager selection and greater risk control and 77% said they would like access to specialist managers for every market.
SEI director of institutional sales Paul Osbourne said the research revealed increasing deficits and growing regulation meant local authorities faced the same problems as corporates.
“Senior executives of local authority pension schemes are under more pressure than ever because of serious issues that are forcing changes to their financial structure.
“These issues include underfunding and its likely impact on the local tax base, growing regulation and the ongoing demands of complying with the Myners Report.”
This week's top stories included Legal & General acquiring MyFutureNow to provide a dashboard service to customers, while also agreeing a hybrid buy-in with a Hitachi scheme.
NEST has signed up to the government-backed Star Initiative, taking all of its 8 million members' pension pots with it.
It is perhaps inherently difficult to find an agreed definition of value for money, but some methodologies could act as a stopgap, argues Jonathan Stapleton.