UK - Further clarification of the precise role the Pensions Regulator will play regarding the funding of defined benefits is crucial for business, the Institute of Directors (IoD) has said.
Miles Templeman, director general of the IoD, said a great deal depended on how the Pensions Regulator would work in practice.
“In particular, how will the Regulator be positioned along the scale from a pure referee to an active player alongside the employer and the pension scheme trustees?”
If acting as a referee, the Regulator would presumably review the evidence and decide whether or not the trustees and the employer would be likely to see the scheme out of difficulties on their own, said Templeman.
“As a player, the Regulator could take too much control. We would like to see the role fall somewhere between the two - sitting down with the parties, exploring ways forward for the scheme and helping the parties to reach agreement.”
In order to be effective in a role of referee and minimal player, the Regulator would need the attitude of a businessman, seeking to ensure that a good deal was done and not afraid to encourage a deal to which some risk was attached, even though the Regulator might be seen as partly responsible for the deal because of actions that were those of a player rather than a referee, he said.
Most respondents in this week's Pensions Buzz do not think businesses should be able suspend AE contributions if in financial distress.
Former BHS owner Dominic Chappell has lost the appeal against his section 72 conviction and sentence for failing to hand over information to The Pensions Regulator (TPR).
This week's top stories include Marsh and McLennan Companies agreeing to buy JLT, and the home secretary calling for AE to be scrapped in a no-deal Brexit scenario.
Lesley Titcomb says the watchdog wants closer interactions with pension funds to spot problems sooner and act before having to use its more stringent powers