UK - Schemes should only change their third-party administrator as a last resort, independent technology and administration consultant Dunnett Shaw says.
Typically, schemes switch providers because of poor working relationships, complaints or poor quality delivery.
But Dunnett Shaw warned schemes over the amount of time and effort required to switch between TPA providers successfully. It said trustees should only change providers if they could not salvage anything from their working relationship.
Dunnett Shaw partner Ian McQuade said: “Moving to another third-party administrator costs schemes time, money and causes them aggravation. If there’s something to save, you have to try.”
He added if schemes were determined to switch providers it was critical they understood their exit position, as “planned exits are less painful”.
Schemes must be aware of the timescale involved in switching providers, the service impact, costs, any penalties contained within their contract and the issue of who owns the data and files.
McQuade said that while trustees “ultimately owned” everything about their scheme, they must be wary of the fact that some contracts would state that the TPA would be allowed to keep certain files and processes and not have to hand them back.
Former BHS owner Dominic Chappell has lost the appeal against his section 72 conviction and sentence for failing to hand over information to The Pensions Regulator (TPR).
This week's top stories include Marsh and McLennan Companies agreeing to buy JLT, and the home secretary calling for AE to be scrapped in a no-deal Brexit scenario.
Lesley Titcomb says the watchdog wants closer interactions with pension funds to spot problems sooner and act before having to use its more stringent powers
The Pension Protection Fund (PPF) is consulting on proposals to charge a "risk reflective" levy for commercial defined benefit (DB) consolidation vehicles.