UK - Brian Wilson, head of benefits research at Bacon & Woodrow (B&W), has spoken out against news reports suggesting that company pension schemes are unsafe.
In a conversation with IPN yesterday, Wilson said that the latest B&W report on pension scheme underfunding has been misinterpreted.
“The fact that company pension schemes are underfunded does not necessarily mean that these schemes are unsafe,” he said.
“It simply means that they need more money. Most companies have been increasing their funding levels anyway”. B&W revealed 83 schemes report funding levels in excess of 100%, including 20 reporting a funding level of 125% or more, up from 14 schemes last year.
Wilson also spoke out against media articles suggesting inaccuracies within B&W’s report.
“There are concerns that our calculations of company pension costings are inaccurate,” he said. “However, we have based our calculations on the pension disclosures contained in companies’ latest financial reports.”
B&W’s study of companies in the FTSE 100 revealed that a wide variation in the funding levels of pension schemes exists, and 17 schemes report a funding level of less than 100% compared to only seven last year. In one instance, the size of the deficit is nearly £170m.
By Janet Du Chenne
The Pensions and Lifetime Savings Association (PLSA) has named the 17 members of its inaugural policy board after a competitive application process with 60 candidates.
Labour Party plans to renationalise core industries and require the largest listed companies to hand 10% of shares to employees would be a "double whammy" for pensions, business leaders have warned.
A handful of industry heavyweights have begun trialling a so-called 'mid-life MOT', with positive initial results reported by all those involved.