Granting discretionary increases was not necessarily precluded by the scheme being in deficit, the Airways Pension Scheme (APS) actuary has said in the landmark High Court case.
Giving witness evidence at the trial Willis Towers Watson's consulting actuary Michael Pardoe said the ability to award increases sat on a spectrum of decision-making and, if the scheme was not ful...
To continue reading this article...
Join Professional Pensions
Signup and gain exclusive members-only insights
- Unlimited access to real-time news, analysis and opinion from the industry
- Receive our in-depth monthly magazine in either print or digital format
- Access our Sustainable Investment Hub covering news and opinion from thought leaders in the ESG space
- Receive important and breaking news stories selected by the Editors in our daily newsletter
- Hear from industry experts and other forward-thinking leaders
- Receive a monthly members-only newsletter with exclusive opinion pieces from leading industry experts and a feature from the magazine in advance of its release date
