The plight of George & Harding scheme members highlights the need for trustees to take independent advice on Pension Protection Fund eligibility, the lifeboat fund says.
The 40 member G&H scheme, which had paid its PPF levy on a regular basis in full, was refused entry because of legal terminology which defined the scheme’s employer (PP Online, 2 December 2010). ...
To continue reading this article...
Join Professional Pensions
Become a Professional Pensions Lite Member today
- Three complimentary articles per month covering the latest real-time news, analysis and opinion from the industry
- Receive important and breaking news stories via our two daily news alerts
- Hear from industry experts and other forward-thinking leaders
Are you a trustee, investment consultant or in-house pension and benefit scheme professional? You can apply for full complimentary access here