• Home
  • Admin/Tech
  • Benefits
  • Buzz
  • DB
  • DC
  • Diversity
  • Investment
  • Law & regulation
  • Risk reduction
  • Events
  • Whitepapers
  • Spotlights
  • Digital Edition
  • PPTV
  • Newsletters
  • Sign in
  •  
      • Newsletters
      • Account details
      • Contact support
      • Sign out
     
    •  

      You are currently accessing ProfessionalPensions via your Enterprise account.

      If you already have an account please use the link below to sign in.

      If you have any problems with your access or would like to request an individual access account please contact our customer service team.

      Phone: +44 (0) 1858 438800

      Email: [email protected]

      • Sign in
  • Follow us
    • Twitter
    • LinkedIn
    • Newsletters
    • YouTube
  • Register
  • Subscribe
  • Events
    • Upcoming events
      event logo
      Investment Conference

      This two part Investment Conference will bring you the latest updates from economists, asset managers and pension consultants. We will be taking a look at the outlook for the 2021 economy, alternatives, cashflow strategies and global equity markets to name a few, assessing how they fared through the volatility and what we can expect for the year ahead.

      • Date: 20 Jan 2021
      • Digital Conference
      event logo
      Webinar: Using passion for ESG to unleash member engagement

      This webinar will look at how pension schemes can harness their members’ interest in ESG to engage them more broadly with their pensions. In particular, it will look at exclusive research showing how members are reacting to ESG; their propensity to act versus their actual behaviour; and the expectations they have of providers in this regard.

      • Date: 26 Jan 2021
      • Webinar
      event logo
      Webinar: What to put on your GMP Equalisation project roadmap for 2021

      This webinar will bring together views from actuaries, lawyers, administrators, trustees and data experts to look at the pragmatic, collaborative solutions that are open to schemes to solve the GMP equalisation challenges in 2021. It will assess the individual challenges schemes face with equalisations and provide some practical options that are available to resolve these issues.

      • Date: 02 Feb 2021
      • Webinar
      event logo
      Webinar: Will the world return to normal in 2021?

      In this webinar, PP editor Jonathan Stapleton will be joined by BMO’s chief economist Steven Bell and director of fiduciary management, Christy Jesudasan, alongside PTL trustee director Melanie Cusack and Isio’s head of fiduciary management oversight Paula Champion to discuss the significant impact of these themes on the pensions sector.

      • Date: 04 Feb 2021
      • Webinar
      View all events
      Follow our Professional Pension Events

      Sign up to receive email alerts about our events

      Sign up

  • Whitepapers
    • How DC schemes can gain exposure to different asset classes in a low-return environment

      So far, DC plans have largely been focused on the onset of auto-enrolment and changes to the regulatory framework - be it the ‘charge cap,' ‘pension freedoms' or consultations around ‘value for money', says Annabel Tonry, Executive Director at J.P. Morgan Asset Management (JPMAM).

      Download
      Pension freedoms three years on

      In 2015 George Osborne, then the UK Chancellor of the Exchequer, decided that those age over 55 could take much more of their pension in cash. This has since opened up a range of possibilities for DC scheme members in the world of pensions.

      Download
      Find whitepapers
      Search by title or subject area
      View all whitepapers
  • Spotlights
  • Digital Edition
Professional Pensions
Professional Pensions
  • Home
  • Admin/Tech
  • Benefits
  • Buzz
  • DB
  • DC
  • Diversity
  • Investment
  • Law & regulation
  • Risk reduction
 
    • Newsletters
    • Account details
    • Contact support
    • Sign out
 
  •  

    You are currently accessing ProfessionalPensions via your Enterprise account.

    If you already have an account please use the link below to sign in.

    If you have any problems with your access or would like to request an individual access account please contact our customer service team.

    Phone: +44 (0) 1858 438800

    Email: [email protected]

    • Sign in
  • Law and Regulation

How DC fund charges will become more transparent

The FCA said the rules would align with incoming PRIIPs regulations
The FCA said the rules would align with incoming PRIIPs regulations
  • James Phillips
  • James Phillips
  • @PPJamesPhillips
  • 20 September 2017
  • Tweet  
  • Facebook  
  • LinkedIn  
  • Send to  
0 Comments

At a glance:

  • All FCA-regulated firms which handle DC money will have new duties
  • Transaction costs will need to be disclosed using the ‘slippage cost' method
  • The move will help trustees and IGCs overcome “absurd challenges”

From 3 January next year, firms looking after DC members' money will need to comply with new disclosure requirements. James Phillips reports.

Transaction costs are high on the agenda, with a number of different bodies discussing what the right framework should be for disclosure.

Nevertheless, firms looking after defined contribution (DC) scheme assets will need to be a step ahead of this, with new requirements coming in mandating disclosure.

Related articles

  • 2021 outlook: What's next for scheme governance?
  • 2021 outlook: What's next for regulation?
  • 2021 outlook: What's next for ESG?
  • 2021 outlook: What's next for schemes?

From 3 January next year, these firms - where they are regulated by the Financial Conduct Authority (FCA) - will be required to provide a breakdown of administration and transaction costs when requested by workplace DC governance bodies.

The new rules will hit all regulated firms handling DC funds, including asset managers, investment banks, and custodians.

 

Slippage costs

Under the rules, announced on 20 September, regulated firms will need to supply information about transaction costs using the ‘slippage cost' methodology, as well as information about administration charges and any other appropriate contextual data.

Where a firm does not have this information, it will be required to seek it from other firms, and if those are FCA-regulated they will also be mandated to provide it, the watchdog said in a policy statement.

The slippage cost methodology, first mooted last October, calculates fees by comparing the price at which a transaction was actually executed with the price when the order to transact entered the market.

Despite this method having previously been criticised, the watchdog said the calculation uses "actual transaction data" to identify "the loss of value from the consumer's perspective", and "reduces the risk that some costs remain hidden".

It said it would also allow trustees and independent governance committees (IGCs) to meet duties regarding considering whether these charges delivered value for money.

The regulator said it had considered requiring firms to provide the data "as a matter of course" but concluded this would lead to confusion as to when the rules would apply, particularly if a firm did not know it was handling pension investments.

The FCA said enforcing this approach would align UK regulation with the European Union's Packaged Retail and Insurance-based Investments (PRIIPs) regulation, which comes into force at the start of next year.

 

‘Spot on'

The move has been roundly welcomed, despite some residual reservations about the method of calculating the costs. Transparency Task Force founding chair Andy Agathangelou believes the move is "spot on".

"I am very pleased to see that the FCA have moved forward with an approach that will enable IGCs to properly scrutinise costs for the benefit of scheme members," he states.

"Nobody should underestimate the vital part that systematic cost control can have in driving better outcomes for pension savers so this is another important step forward by the FCA, embracing the transformational power of transparency once again. The general direction of travel is spot on."

The policy will be of benefit to both members and trustees, and will build trust in the system, others add. JLT Employee Benefits head of DC investment consulting Maria Nazarova-Doyle argues the proposal will allow trustees to fulfil their legal obligations.

"Savers will be clear beneficiaries as it will be easier to compare the real costs of different investments, which will ultimately drive costs down across the investment providers," she says.

"In addition, this move will help to resolve the absurd challenges facing trustees of DC pension schemes who have to disclose scheme funds' transaction costs to their members whilst being unable to obtain this information from investment managers because they were not legally required to provide them."

And even though the method has been criticised, Aegon pensions director Steven Cameron says it will allow the industry to get on with disclosure.

"After many, many months the FCA has decided to implement its proposals largely unchanged," he states. "There will always be controversy over the best way to calculate transaction costs but the fund management industry now needs to move forward and provide this information to IGCs.

"We expect a number of technical questions will arise and hope the FCA will ensure these are answered in a way that ensures consistency."

 

Disclosure framework

The announcement comes after the financial watchdog consulted with the industry, receiving 43 responses, and last month appointed Dr Chris Sier to chair an independent working group to consider a template for transaction cost disclosure.

This group, which met for the first time on 7 September, is deliberating on how to best encourage the template's adoption, how it will be something that is easily complied with, and what mechanism will satisfy both the provider and user.

It will also comprise sub-working groups, which will consider how the template will work with specific asset classes, including long equity, fixed income, foreign exchange, and private equity.

For this reason, the FCA said it would also consult on how costs and charges should be disclosed and published to schemes members in the second quarter of the next year, with an attempt to echo a DWP consultation anticipated later this year.

The rules do not define a standardised format for disclosing the information; the regulator said "we do not see a need to make rules to specify how information should be presented" to DC governance bodies. However, it saw the "value of more consistent and standardised" disclosure to institutional investors, and said its working group would address this.

The People's Pension head of policy and government relations Andy Tarrant welcomes the FCA's steps, but says it is now more important to ensure a standardised disclosure code is developed.

"We look forward to the FCA working group agreeing on a template for disclosure as this will make it easier for fund managers to produce comparable information and for trustees and governance bodies to compare between them," he states.

Affected firms will now need to ensure they understand the methodology and get their processes in place to comply ahead of the deadline, with any DC governance body able to request their information from day one.

B&CE has published a full breakdown of transaction costs for The People's Pension - revealing both the explicit and implicit costs for its default fund.

  • Tweet  
  • Facebook  
  • LinkedIn  
  • Send to  
  • Topics
  • Law and Regulation
  • Employee Benefits
  • Financial Conduct Authority
  • FCA
  • Transparency Task Force
  • Andy Agathangelou
  • cost transparency
  • Fee transparency
  • transparency
  • IGC
  • Independent Governance Committee

More on Law and Regulation

Fairs: Working through the issues raised from the consultation
TPR response to funding code consultation reveals level of industry concern over twin-track regime

The Pensions Regulator (TPR) has published the interim response to its first defined benefit (DB) funding code consultation – highlighting the depth of industry concern around its proposed twin-track regime.

  • Law and Regulation
  • 14 January 2021
Opperman: No-one should find their hard-earned pension savings eaten away by charges
DWP sets de-minimis for flat-fee AE charges and launches work to standardise cost reporting

The Department for Work and Pensions (DWP) will ban the charging of flat fees on AE auto-enrolment (AE) pots below £100 and launch work on how to standardise cost and charges reporting.

  • Law and Regulation
  • 13 January 2021
2021 outlook: What's next for regulation?

After a year that took everyone by surprise, experts tell Professional Pensions what could be on the horizon for regulation in 2021.

  • Law and Regulation
  • 30 December 2020
TPR bans corporate trustee and its director for 'serious' failings

The Pensions Regulator (TPR) has banned a corporate trustee and one of its directors from acting as pension scheme trustees after multiple governance failures highlighted a lack of competence, capability and integrity.

  • Law and Regulation
  • 24 December 2020
Equalising transfers: What if there was another way?

Steve Nicholson looks at how schemes can go about implementing the most recent Lloyds ruling

  • Law and Regulation
  • 18 December 2020
blog comments powered by Disqus
Back to Top

Most read

Opperman: New TPR powers will not be backdated
Opperman: New TPR powers will not be backdated
DWP sets de-minimis for flat-fee AE charges and launches work to standardise cost reporting
DWP sets de-minimis for flat-fee AE charges and launches work to standardise cost reporting
Barclays Bank UK Retirement Fund integrates ESG and climate risk into £1.3bn DGF
Barclays Bank UK Retirement Fund integrates ESG and climate risk into £1.3bn DGF
LGPS to become negative cashflow 'by 2024'
LGPS to become negative cashflow 'by 2024'
TPR response to funding code consultation reveals level of industry concern over twin-track regime
TPR response to funding code consultation reveals level of industry concern over twin-track regime
Trustpilot

 

  • Contact Us
  • Marketing solutions
  • About Incisive Media
  • Terms and conditions
  • Policies
  • Careers
  • Twitter
  • LinkedIn
  • Newsletters
  • YouTube

© Incisive Business Media (IP) Limited, Published by Incisive Business Media Limited, New London House, 172 Drury Lane, London WC2B 5QR, registered in England and Wales with company registration numbers 09177174 & 09178013

Digital publisher of the year
Digital publisher of the year 2010, 2013, 2016 & 2017
Loading